Rai Bahadur Singh and Another v Bank of India

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date21 May 1993
Date21 May 1993
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 184 of 1992
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Au Wai Pang v AG
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 30 April 2014
    ...contours of this line could only be determined on a case-by-case basis: at [69] , [70] and [73] .] Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Singh [1993] 2 SLR (R) 1; [1993] 2 SLR 592 (refd) Brown v Brook (1902) 86 LT 373 (refd) Clagett's Estate, Re; Fordham v Clagett (1882) 20 Ch D 637 (refd) Cropper v ......
  • Salim Anthony v Sumitomo Corporation Capital Asia Pte Ltd and Others and Another Application
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 3 September 2004
    ...on the basis that the additional evidence could be adduced, and the other without the same: at [12]. Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Singh [1993] 2 SLR (R) 1; [1993] 2 SLR 592 (refd) Benson v Benson [1941] P 90; [1941] 2 All ER 335 (folld) Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489; [1954] 3 All ER 745 ......
  • Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd ((in Liquidation))
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 16 March 2005
    ...to take a required step in time. This difference was noted by Judith Prakash JC (as she then was) in Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Smith [1993] 2 SLR 592 when she said at 597, [T]hese factors [the four factors listed in Hau Khee Wee] are factors to be considered when an applicant wants leave ......
  • Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General and another matter
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 30 April 2014
    ...Hon Ching [1985-1986] SLR(R) 869 (at [7]) and the Singapore Court of Appeal decision of Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Singh and another [1993] 2 SLR(R) 1 (“Bank of India”) (at [14]) cited the same passage with approval. The definition in Stroud’s Judicial Dictionary appears to have stemmed fr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE COURT’S DISCRETION TO EXTEND TIME
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1999, December 1999
    • 1 December 1999
    ...1996). Unreported judgment of Judith Prakash J. 98 [1987] 2 MLJ 146. 99 See below. 100 [1991] 3 MLJ 208, at 212. 101 [1992] 1 SLR 1. 102 [1993] 2 SLR 592. 103 Cited above. 104 [1993] 2 SLR 592, at pp 597—598. 105 See, for example, the cases mentioned in the preceding paragraph. 106 See the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT