Rai Bahadur Singh and Another v Bank of India
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 21 May 1993 |
| Date | 21 May 1993 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 184 of 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 cases
-
Au Wai Pang v AG
...contours of this line could only be determined on a case-by-case basis: at [69] , [70] and [73] .] Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Singh [1993] 2 SLR (R) 1; [1993] 2 SLR 592 (refd) Brown v Brook (1902) 86 LT 373 (refd) Clagett's Estate, Re; Fordham v Clagett (1882) 20 Ch D 637 (refd) Cropper v ......
-
Salim Anthony v Sumitomo Corporation Capital Asia Pte Ltd and Others and Another Application
...on the basis that the additional evidence could be adduced, and the other without the same: at [12]. Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Singh [1993] 2 SLR (R) 1; [1993] 2 SLR 592 (refd) Benson v Benson [1941] P 90; [1941] 2 All ER 335 (folld) Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489; [1954] 3 All ER 745 ......
-
Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd ((in Liquidation))
...to take a required step in time. This difference was noted by Judith Prakash JC (as she then was) in Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Smith [1993] 2 SLR 592 when she said at 597, [T]hese factors [the four factors listed in Hau Khee Wee] are factors to be considered when an applicant wants leave ......
-
Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General and another matter
...Hon Ching [1985-1986] SLR(R) 869 (at [7]) and the Singapore Court of Appeal decision of Bank of India v Rai Bahadur Singh and another [1993] 2 SLR(R) 1 (“Bank of India”) (at [14]) cited the same passage with approval. The definition in Stroud’s Judicial Dictionary appears to have stemmed fr......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE COURT’S DISCRETION TO EXTEND TIME
...1996). Unreported judgment of Judith Prakash J. 98 [1987] 2 MLJ 146. 99 See below. 100 [1991] 3 MLJ 208, at 212. 101 [1992] 1 SLR 1. 102 [1993] 2 SLR 592. 103 Cited above. 104 [1993] 2 SLR 592, at pp 597—598. 105 See, for example, the cases mentioned in the preceding paragraph. 106 See the ......