Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date30 July 1991
Date30 July 1991
Docket NumberOriginating Motion No 19 of 1991
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
49 cases
  • Lim Hwee Meng v Citadel Investment Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 6 Agosto 1998
    ...cases: Ratnam v Cumarasamy & Anor [1965] 1 MLJ 228 , Tan Chai Heng v Yeo Seng Choon [1981] 1 MLJ 271 and Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin [1991] 3 MLJ 208 . We do not intend to deal with these cases in detail. Suffice it to say that these cases concern applications by the appellants to file e......
  • Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and Others and Another Suit
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 6 Noviembre 2007
    ... ... laid down, most notably perhaps, by the decision of this court in Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin (“ Pearson ”) [1991] SLR 212 ... The court ... ...
  • Hong Huat Development Company (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 16 Marzo 2001
    ...HL (refd) Ong Chen Leng v Tan Sau Poo [1993] 2 SLR (R) 545; [1993] 3 SLR 137 (refd) Pearson Judith Rosemary v Chen Chien Wen Edwin [1991] 2 SLR (R) 260; [1991] SLR 212 (folld) Perini Corp v Commonwealth of Australia (1969) 12 BLR 82 (folld) Rio Sun, The [1982] 1 All ER 517; [1982] 1 WLR 158......
  • Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 7 Diciembre 2005
    ...Magrath, Provost of Queen's College, Oxford University (1889) 14 App Cas 665 (refd) Pearson Judith Rosemary v Chen Chien Wen Edwin [1991] 2 SLR (R) 260; [1991] SLR 212 (folld) Pertamina v Thahir Kartika Ratna [1981-1982] SLR (R) 653; [1982-1983] SLR 351 (folld) Public Service Commission v L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE COURT’S DISCRETION TO EXTEND TIME
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1999, December 1999
    • 1 Diciembre 1999
    ...Wah Nam Plastic Industry Pte Ltd (Suit No 104 of 1996). Unreported judgment of Judith Prakash J. 98 [1987] 2 MLJ 146. 99 See below. 100 [1991] 3 MLJ 208, at 212. 101 [1992] 1 SLR 1. 102 [1993] 2 SLR 592. 103 Cited above. 104 [1993] 2 SLR 592, at pp 597—598. 105 See, for example, the cases m......
  • Arbitration
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 Diciembre 2019
    ...Laws: Final Report (LRRD No 3/2001, 2001). 86 See Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction Pte Ltd [2020] 3 SLR 1196 at [31]. 87 [1991] 2 SLR(R) 260. 88 [2000] 1 SLR(R) 510. 89 2nd Ed, 2009. 90 See para 4.32 above. 91 See para 4.37 above. 92 See para 4.64 above. 93 See para 4.64 above....

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT