Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 30 July 1991 |
| Date | 30 July 1991 |
| Docket Number | Originating Motion No 19 of 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
49 cases
-
Lim Hwee Meng v Citadel Investment Pte Ltd
...cases: Ratnam v Cumarasamy & Anor [1965] 1 MLJ 228 , Tan Chai Heng v Yeo Seng Choon [1981] 1 MLJ 271 and Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin [1991] 3 MLJ 208 . We do not intend to deal with these cases in detail. Suffice it to say that these cases concern applications by the appellants to file e......
-
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and Others and Another Suit
... ... laid down, most notably perhaps, by the decision of this court in Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin (“ Pearson ”) [1991] SLR 212 ... The court ... ...
-
Hong Huat Development Company (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd
...HL (refd) Ong Chen Leng v Tan Sau Poo [1993] 2 SLR (R) 545; [1993] 3 SLR 137 (refd) Pearson Judith Rosemary v Chen Chien Wen Edwin [1991] 2 SLR (R) 260; [1991] SLR 212 (folld) Perini Corp v Commonwealth of Australia (1969) 12 BLR 82 (folld) Rio Sun, The [1982] 1 All ER 517; [1982] 1 WLR 158......
-
Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General
...Magrath, Provost of Queen's College, Oxford University (1889) 14 App Cas 665 (refd) Pearson Judith Rosemary v Chen Chien Wen Edwin [1991] 2 SLR (R) 260; [1991] SLR 212 (folld) Pertamina v Thahir Kartika Ratna [1981-1982] SLR (R) 653; [1982-1983] SLR 351 (folld) Public Service Commission v L......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE COURT’S DISCRETION TO EXTEND TIME
...Wah Nam Plastic Industry Pte Ltd (Suit No 104 of 1996). Unreported judgment of Judith Prakash J. 98 [1987] 2 MLJ 146. 99 See below. 100 [1991] 3 MLJ 208, at 212. 101 [1992] 1 SLR 1. 102 [1993] 2 SLR 592. 103 Cited above. 104 [1993] 2 SLR 592, at pp 597—598. 105 See, for example, the cases m......
-
Arbitration
...Laws: Final Report (LRRD No 3/2001, 2001). 86 See Ng Tze Chew Diana v Aikco Construction Pte Ltd [2020] 3 SLR 1196 at [31]. 87 [1991] 2 SLR(R) 260. 88 [2000] 1 SLR(R) 510. 89 2nd Ed, 2009. 90 See para 4.32 above. 91 See para 4.37 above. 92 See para 4.64 above. 93 See para 4.64 above....