Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd ((in Liquidation))

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeChao Hick Tin JA
Judgment Date16 March 2005
Neutral Citation[2005] SGCA 14
Citation[2005] SGCA 14
Date16 March 2005
Year2005
Plaintiff CounselFrancis Goh (Ari, Goh and Partners)
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 88 of 2004
Defendant CounselAshok Kumar, Eugene Thuraisingam and J Sathiaseelan (Allen and Gledhill)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Published date17 March 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • December 7, 2005
    ...Fund Ltd v Ethical Investments Ltd [2000] 2 SLR (R) 926; [2000] 4 SLR 46 (folld) Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd [2005] 2 SLR (R) 561; [2005] 2 SLR 561 (folld) Oswald Joseph Reichel, Clerk (Pauper), The Rev v The Rev John Richard Magrath, Provost of Queen's College, Oxford ......
  • Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and Others and Another Suit
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • November 6, 2007
    ...Holdings Ltd [2002] 2 SLR 225 at [27]; AD v AE [2004] 2 SLR 505 at [10]; as well as Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd [2005] 2 SLR 561 at [8] and [11]. When applying these factors, the overriding consideration is that the Rules of Court must prima facie be obeyed, with reason......
  • Sun Jin Engineering
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • January 21, 2011
    ...whether or not it wishes to appeal. As this court observed in Ong Cheng Aik [v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) [2005] 2 SLR(R) 561] at [8]: In respect of such an application for extension of time [to file or serve a notice of appeal out of time], the court takes a rather s......
  • Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • August 1, 2014
    ...Ltd[2002] 1 SLR (R) 633 at [27]; AD v AE[2004] 2 SLR (R) 505 at [10]; as well as Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd[2005] 2 SLR (R) 561 at [8] and [11]. When applying these factors, the overriding consideration is that the Rules of Court must prima facie be obeyed, with reason......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT