Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd ((in Liquidation))
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
| Judge | Chao Hick Tin JA |
| Judgment Date | 16 March 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] SGCA 14 |
| Citation | [2005] SGCA 14 |
| Year | 2005 |
| Published date | 17 March 2005 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 88 of 2004 |
| Date | 16 March 2005 |
| Subject Matter | Extension of time,Appellant timeously filing notice of appeal,Civil Procedure,Appellant's application for extension of time to file record of appeal dismissed by single judge Court of Appeal,Applicable principles,Whether court should grant extension of time,Appellant appealing to full Court of Appeal,Order 57 r 9(1) Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2004 Rev Ed) |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Francis Goh (Ari, Goh and Partners) |
| Defendant Counsel | Ashok Kumar, Eugene Thuraisingam and J Sathiaseelan (Allen and Gledhill) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party and Others and Another Suit
...Holdings Ltd [2002] 2 SLR 225 at [27]; AD v AE [2004] 2 SLR 505 at [10]; as well as Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd [2005] 2 SLR 561 at [8] and [11]. When applying these factors, the overriding consideration is that the Rules of Court must prima facie be obeyed, with reason......
-
Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General
...Fund Ltd v Ethical Investments Ltd [2000] 2 SLR (R) 926; [2000] 4 SLR 46 (folld) Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd [2005] 2 SLR (R) 561; [2005] 2 SLR 561 (folld) Oswald Joseph Reichel, Clerk (Pauper), The Rev v The Rev John Richard Magrath, Provost of Queen's College, Oxford ......
-
Sun Jin Engineering
...whether or not it wishes to appeal. As this court observed in Ong Cheng Aik [v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) [2005] 2 SLR(R) 561] at [8]: In respect of such an application for extension of time [to file or serve a notice of appeal out of time], the court takes a rather s......
-
Falmac Ltd v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie
...Ltd[2002] 1 SLR (R) 633 at [27]; AD v AE[2004] 2 SLR (R) 505 at [10]; as well as Ong Cheng Aik v Dayco Products Singapore Pte Ltd[2005] 2 SLR (R) 561 at [8] and [11]. When applying these factors, the overriding consideration is that the Rules of Court must prima facie be obeyed, with reason......
Get Started for Free