Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Goel Adesh Kumar and another appeal

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeJudith Prakash JA,Tay Yong Kwang JA,Steven Chong JA
Judgment Date02 October 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Docket NumberCivil Appeals Nos 127 of 2017 and 21 of 2018
Date02 October 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Michael Vaz Lorrain v Singapore Rifle Association
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 20 November 2020
    ...[O 22A r 9(3)]”. In our view, this contention is untenable. In Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Goel Adesh Kumar and another appeal [2018] 2 SLR 1070 (“Resorts World at Sentosa”), this court stated that “[i]n determining whether an offer to settle is reasonable, serious or genuine, it wou......
  • The “Navigator Aries”
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 21 September 2023
    ...Pte Ltd [2014] 2 SLR 1285 (refd) Osprey, The [1967] 1 Lloyd's Rep 76 (refd) Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Goel Adesh Kumar [2018] 2 SLR 1070 (refd) SBS Transit Ltd v Koh Swee Ann [2004] 3 SLR(R) 365; [2004] 3 SLR 365 (refd) Zhang Jinwei v Tradsurance Agency Pte Ltd [2022] SGMC 58 (refd......
  • Goel Adesh Kumar v Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 24 April 2020
    ...costs orders relevant to the present application. They are (see Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Goel Adesh Kumar and another appeal [2018] 2 SLR 1070 (“the CA Costs Judgment”) at [38]): The respondent shall pay the applicant’s costs incurred in the Suit on a standard basis on the Magistr......
  • The "Navigator Aries"
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 21 September 2023
    ...by the appellant: see, in the context of offers to settle, Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Goel Adesh Kumar and another appeal [2018] 2 SLR 1070 at [20]–[22]; Man B&W Diesel S E Asia Pte Ltd and another v PT Bumi International Tankers and another appeal [2004] 3 SLR(R) 267 at [8]. There ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...[8]–[10], per Coulson J; Prospect Healthcare (Hairmyres) Ltd v Kier Build Ltd [2018] CSIH 43; Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd v Kumar [2018] SGCA 58 at [28]. See also Jebsens (UK) Ltd v JR Inwards Ltd (Unreported, Eng. Ct App, Fox, Parker and Staughton LJJ, 28 Jan 1988). 1165 RTA v Dederer......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...Ed) was satisfied and the cost consequences therein applied. See para 8.244 below. 163 See para 8.26 above. 164 [2018] 2 SLR 1043. 165 [2018] 2 SLR 1070. See para 8.247 below. 166 See paras 8.238–8.240 above. 167 [2018] SGHC 146. See also Long Well Group v Commerzbank AG [2018] SGHC 164 whe......