Singapore Airlines Ltd and Another v Fujitsu Microelectronics (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and Others
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 05 January 2001 |
| Date | 05 January 2001 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 21 of 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
- Law Society of Singapore v Bay Puay Joo Lilian
-
WBG Network (S) Pte Ltd v Sunny Daisy Ltd
... ... The defendant, WBG Network (Singapore) Pte Ltd (“WBG”) brought Summons No. 5135 of ... ), a court would have to allow, equally, another judge exercising a co-ordinate jurisdiction to ... ...
-
Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis
... ... had a duty to expose the flaws of others. Accordingly, as a matter of law and policy, it ... law enforcement officers; or, to put it another way, that criminal justice would lose its moral ... L bought the heroin in Malaysia" and flew with C to Australia with the heroin in C\xE2" ... ...
-
Colliers International (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Senkee Logistics Pte Ltd
...of Appeal decisions in The Endurance [1999] 1 SLR 661 and Singapore Airlines Ltd v Fujitsu Microelectronics (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd No 2 [2001] 1 SLR 532. Even in a case where the defendants struck out the plaintiff’s claim as being frivolous and vexatious and the defendants had made an Offer to......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...40. Interest on sum to be repaid on successful appeal 6.34 In Singapore Airlines Ltd v Fujitsu Microelectronics (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (No 2)[2001] 1 SLR 532, the Court of Appeal”s decision to allow an appeal resulted in the judgment sum having to be returned to the appellant. The question that......
-
Civil Procedure
...Indosuez v Banque Nationale de Paris[2001] 1 SLR(R) 609 and Singapore Airlines Ltd v Fujitsu Microelectronics (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd[2001] 1 SLR(R) 38. Those two cases concern the same issue of whether interest on a judgment debt should be payable when a lower court's judgment is later reversed......