Public Prosecutor v Chew Suang Heng
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 26 January 2001 |
| Date | 26 January 2001 |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Appeal No 276 of 2000 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
23 cases
-
PP v Ang Seng Thor
...(refd) Lim Teck Chye v PP [2004] 2 SLR (R) 525; [2004] 2 SLR 525 (refd) PP v Chang Kar Yang [2006] SGDC 85 (refd) PP v Chew Suang Heng [2001] 1 SLR (R) 127; [2001] 1 SLR 692 (refd) PP v Fong Kit Sum [2008] SGDC 58 (refd) PP v Loqmanul Hakim bin Buang [2007] 4 SLR (R) 753; [2007] 4 SLR 753 (......
-
Lim Teck Chye v Public Prosecutor
...strands together, but for the sake of clarity I shall deal with them in turn. 64 The appellant cited the case of PP v Chew Suang Heng [2001] 1 SLR 692 at [9], where I There is no doubt that attempting to bribe a law enforcement officer and interfering in the proper course of police investig......
-
Goh Ngak Eng v PP
...2 SLR 449 (refd) PP v Ang Seng Thor [2011] 4 SLR 217 (folld) PP v Azlin bte Arujunah [2022] SGCA 52 (folld) PP v Chew Suang Heng [2001] 1 SLR(R) 127; [2201] 1 SLR 692 (refd) PP v Geow Chwee Hiam [2016] SGDC 139 (refd) PP v Huang Hong Si [2003] 3 SLR(R) 57; [2003] 3 SLR 57 (refd) PP v Lam Ki......
-
Public Prosecutor v AOM
...Hoon Choo [2000] 1 SLR(R) 221 at [14]; Public Prosecutor v Ong Ker Seng [2001] SGHC 226 at [29]; Public Prosecutor v Chew Suang Heng [2001] 1 SLR(R) 127 at [18]), and it cannot be said that the absence of an aggravating factor is something which the defendant should be given credit for. In ......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...corruption offences that take place in the private sector generally do not attract custodial sentences. He relied on PP v Chew Suang Heng[2001] 1 SLR 692 at [9]: Generally, corruption offences involving law enforcement officers or other public servants attract harsher penalties and custodia......
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...imply that he was more prone to commit robbery. The High Court subsequently also came to a similar conclusion in PP v Chew Suang Heng[2001] 1 SLR 692 at [19]. 11.115 This approach was confirmed in PP v Norhisham bin Mohamad Dahlan[2003] 4 SLR 81. The accused, with his fellow secret society ......
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...particular offence. Corruption offences involving public servants 12.80 The former Chief Justice Yong Pung How in PP v Chew Suang Heng[2001] 1 SLR 692 had set a custodial sentence to be the benchmark sentence for corruption offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act (Cap 241, 1993 Rev ......