Wong Loke Cheng v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Yong Pung How CJ |
| Judgment Date | 11 December 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] SGHC 299 |
| Citation | [2002] SGHC 299 |
| Published date | 19 September 2003 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Appeal No 127 of 2002 |
| Date | 11 December 2002 |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Jimmy Yim SC and Eugene Quah (Drew & Napier LLC) |
| Defendant Counsel | Winston Cheng Howe Ming (Deputy Public Prosecutor) |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
PP v Ang Seng Thor
...Gordon Foxley (1995) 16 Cr App R (S) 879 (refd) Soong Hee Sin v PP [2001] 1 SLR (R) 475; [2001] 2 SLR 253 (refd) Wong Loke Cheng v PP [2003] 1 SLR (R) 522; [2003] 1 SLR 522 (refd) Wong Teck Long v PP [2005] 3 SLR (R) 488; [2005] 3 SLR 488 (refd) Zhao Zhipeng v PP [2008] 4 SLR (R) 879; [2008......
-
Public Prosecutor v Peter Khoo Chong Meng
...would-be offenders that Singapore does not and will not, without exception, condone corruption.’ The offender in Wong Loke Cheng v PP [2003] 1 SLR(R) 522; [2002] SGHC 299 who had been given a global sentence of 10 months' imprisonment and a penalty of $157,255.98 was tried and convicted of ......
-
Public Prosecutor v Andrew Tee Fook Boon
...For examples of cases where s 71(1) was ruled inapplicable, see: Tay Boon Sien v PP [1998] 2 SLR(R) 39 and Wong Loke Cheng v PP [2003] 1 SLR(R) 522. Public The primary sentencing consideration in corruption cases is that of general deterrence. In PP v Lim Teck Choon [2009] 2 SLR(R) 577, VK ......
-
Public Prosecutor v Goh Chan Chong (Wu Zhenzhong)
...imposed: namely Lam Khing Lang @ David v PP MA 522/92 (“Lam Khing Lang” involving gratification of $87,077.48), PP v Wong Loke Cheng [2003] 1 SLR(R) 522 (“Wong Loke Cheng” involving gratification of USD90,377 - equivalent to S$157,225.98), and Wong Teck Long v PP [2005] 3 SLR(R) 488 (“Wong ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...s 8 of the Republic of Singapore Independence Act. Whether multiple acts constitute one composite offence 11.20 In Wong Loke Cheng v PP[2003] 1 SLR 522, the appellant had been convicted after trial of nine charges of corruption under s 6(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (Cap 241, 1993......