Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Judgment Date | 04 January 2007 |
| Docket Number | Suit No 665 of 2004 (Summons No 3286 of 2006) |
| Date | 04 January 2007 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Aoo v Aon
... ... Pte Ltd [2008] 4 SLR (R) 907; [2008] 4 SLR 907 (refd) Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Pneupac Ltd [1982] 1 WLR 185 (folld) Su Sh-Hsyu v Wee Yue Chew [2007] 3 SLR (R) 673; [2007] 3 SLR 673 (folld) Tommey v Tommey [1983] Fam 15 (folld) TQ v TR [2009] 2 SLR (R) 961; ... ...
-
Su Sh-Hsyu v Wee Yue Chew
...her absence. The application was dismissed by the trial judge and the grounds of her decision are reported at Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2007] 1 SLR 1092 (“the GD”). We allowed the appeal only after admitting fresh evidence and now set out our full grounds of 2 The facts that give rise to t......
-
Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu
...a witness. I note that Hsieh did not attend court when the action first came up for trial on 6 July 2006 (see Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2007] 1 SLR 1092). No explanation was offered for his absence this time round. His affidavit of evidence-in-chief affirmed on 29 April 2006 was not admitt......
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...the same matter). Judgments and orders Setting aside judgment due to absence at trial 7.53 The High Court in Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu[2007] 1 SLR 1092 held that the reason given for non-attendance was a predominant consideration in deciding whether to set aside the judgment obtained in the......