VZP v VZQ
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Jason Gabriel Chiang |
| Judgment Date | 18 January 2022 |
| Neutral Citation | [2022] SGFC 8 |
| Court | Family Court (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | FC/D 2196 of 2020 |
| Year | 2022 |
| Published date | 26 January 2022 |
| Hearing Date | 21 September 2021,12 August 2021,05 August 2021,10 August 2021,04 October 2021,07 October 2021 |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Mr Liew Chen Mine of Aptus Law Corporation |
| Defendant Counsel | Ms Nur Amalina Binte Kamal of Ika Law LLC |
| Citation | [2022] SGFC 8 |
The key dispute in this case largely revolved around the division of the matrimonial home, and whether the marriage would be classified as a single or dual-income marriage for the application of the relevant legal principles.
The 1
Having considered the 1
The Wife being dissatisfied with my decision filed an appeal, HCF/DCA 138/2021 on 18 October 2021 against my orders made in ORC 5486, in relation to the following:
Even though the appeal is limited...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
WPV v WPW
...after CPF refunds. The Wife’s Counsel referred the Court to 3 decisions in support of her position: UTF v UTG [2019] SGFC 53; VZP v VZQ [2022] SGFC 8; and CYH v CYI [2023] SGHCF 4. My first observation was that, having heard the matter and issued my decision, I was functus officio. While I ......