Vjm v Vjl

JurisdictionSingapore
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
JudgeDebbie Ong J
Judgment Date23 June 2021
Docket NumberDistrict Court Appeals Nos 55 and 56 of 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • WKM v WKN
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 7 February 2024
    ...major decisions for their child”. It also “assures the child that both her parents continue to be equally present and important in her life”: VJM v VJL and another appeal [2021] 5 SLR 1233 (“VJM”) at [20]. “[T]he child’s best interests is intimately entwined with the proper discharge of par......
  • WYV v WYW
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 28 June 2024
    ...as tools to control or hurt the other spouse. In this regard, the observations by the Family Division of the High Court in VJM v VJL [2021] 5 SLR 1233 (at [22]) bear … It might well be that the future holds new needs for that child, and further adjustments in living arrangements will be req......
  • WAG v WAH
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 7 February 2022
    ...time with the child to a mere 3 hours of supervised access. In this regard, the following observation of Debbie Ong J in VJM v VJL [2021] SGHCF 16 (“VJM v VJL”) (at [20]) is apposite: Given that it is accepted that joint parenting is in the child’s welfare, it seems ironic that a parent who......
  • VSR v VSS
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 19 July 2021
    ...parents should rise above their own intractable conflict for the sake of the child was earlier addressed by Debbie Ong J in VJM v VJL [2021] SGHCF 16, where on appeal, an order for joint custody and relocation of the child, N, from Singapore to the United States was upheld. Her Honour remar......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 December 2021
    ...173 VDX v VDY [2021] SGHCF 2 at [39]. 174 VDX v VDY [2021] SGHCF 2 at [37]. 175 VDX v VDY [2021] SGHCF 2 at [40]. 176 [2021] 5 SLR 1233. 177 VJM v VJL [2021] 5 SLR 1233 at [4]. 178 VJM v VJL [2021] 5 SLR 1233 at [3]. 179 VJM v VJL [2021] 5 SLR 1233 at [5]......