Uha v Uhb
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Debbie Ong J |
| Judgment Date | 27 May 2019 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | District Court Appeals Nos 37 and 38 of 2018 |
| Date | 27 May 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
23 cases
-
VYT v VYU
...of the parents. In relation to the proportion each parent should bear for the Child, Justice Debbie Ong in UHA v UHB and another appeal [2020] 3 SLR 666 succinctly summarized at [36] that the equal responsibility to provide for the child may not be equal sharing of expenses and may differ b......
-
VSN v VSO
...order. In relation to the proportion each parent should bear for the Child, Justice Debbie Ong in UHA v UHB and another appeal [2020] 3 SLR 666 succinctly summarized at [36] that the equal responsibility to provide for the child may not be equal sharing of expenses and may differ based on t......
-
VSN v VSO
...order. In relation to the proportion each parent should bear for the Child, Justice Debbie Ong in UHA v UHB and another appeal [2020] 3 SLR 666 succinctly summarized at [36] that the equal responsibility to provide for the child may not be equal sharing of expenses and may differ based on t......
-
UHB v UHA
...UHA [2017] SGFC 131; UHB v UHA [2017] SGFC 134; UHA v UHB [2017] SGHCF 27; UHB v UHA [2018] SGFC 26; UHA v UHB [2018] SGFC 63; UHA v UHB [2019] SGHCF 12. E is now 14 years of age; the Father is now married, though not to the Mother. SUM 2859 was heard before me on 18 October 2019. In additi......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Family Law
...process and eliminate or reduce as many of the risks as possible. 133 [2005] 3 SLR(R) 690. 134 CX v CY [2005] 3 SLR(R) 690 at [26]. 135 [2019] SGHCF 12. 136 UHA v UHB [2019] SGHCF 12 at [69]. 137 UHA v UHB [2019] SGHCF 12 at [1]. 138 UHA v UHB [2019] SGHCF 12 at [43]. 139 UHA v UHB [2019] S......