UFZ v UFY

JurisdictionSingapore
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
JudgeDebbie Ong J
Judgment Date13 March 2018
Neutral Citation[2018] SGHCF 8
Citation[2018] SGHCF 8
Defendant CounselYeo Khee Chye Raymond (Raymond Yeo)
Published date27 March 2018
Plaintiff CounselYap Teong Liang and Tan Hui Qing (T L Yap Law Chambers LLC)
Date13 March 2018
Docket NumberHCF/District Court Appeal No 120 of 2017
Hearing Date31 January 2018
Subject MatterCustody,Family law,Relocation,Care and control
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • VLO v VLP
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 29 June 2021
    ...and has proper plans for the child’s future unlike the mother.42 The Law The law on relocation has been succinctly set out by Debbie Ong J in UFZ v UFY [2018] SGHCF 8 (“UFZ”) and UYK v UYJ [2020] SGHCF 9 (“UYK”). Her Honour observed as follows in UFZ: [7] The applicable legal principles in ......
  • UXH v UXI
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 17 June 2019
    ...benefit to them.69 Principles on Relocation The principles guiding the courts on relocation applications are summarised in UFZ v UFY [2018] SGHCF 8 (at [7] & [8]) (“UFZ”) as follows: 7. The applicable legal principles in relocation applications have been set out by the Court of Appeal in BN......
  • UQV v UQW
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 12 December 2018
    ...and second, the child’s loss of relationship with the “left-behind” parent (BNS at [28]; see also the subsequent High Court decision of UFZ v UFY [2018] 4 SLR 1350 (“UFZ”) (at [8]). Following from these two decisions, decisions dealing relocation would almost entirely approach the issue pri......
  • VDR v VDS
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 16 December 2019
    ...to one another must depend, in the final analysis, on a consideration of all the facts in each case.” In the recent case of UFZ v UFY [2018] SGHCF 8 at [17] (“UFZ”), it was also observed as follows: “While one may draw certain analogies to the cases I have cited, one must never simply appro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review Nbr. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...126 TAU v TAT [2018] 5 SLR 1089 at [28]. 127 TAU v TAT [2018] 5 SLR 1089 at [31]. 128 [2018] SGHCF 9. 129 See para 16.51 above. 130 [2018] 4 SLR 1350. 131 UFZ v UFY [2018] 4 SLR 1350 at [8]. 132 UFZ v UFY [2018] 4 SLR 1350 at [21]. 133 UFZ v UFY [2018] 4 SLR 1350 at [31] and [34]. 134 UFZ v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT