Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Company Ltd

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date30 October 2014
Date30 October 2014
Docket NumberOriginating Summons No 1114 of 2014
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Lao Holdings NV v Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 September 2021
    ...as the breach was not merely technical or minor, and it refers to the decision in Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 (“Triulzi”) at [54], [64]–[66]. In addition, the plaintiffs say that they have been prejudiced. They submit that the test for prejudice is not h......
  • Lao Holdings NV and another v Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 24 November 2022
    ...AJU; Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] 4 SLR 1057 (“Quarella”); Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 (“Triulzi”); AQZ v ARA [2015] 2 SLR 972 (“AQZ”) and CBS v CPB [2021] 1 SLR 935 (“CBS”). None of those authorities support the Appellants’ subm......
  • CFJ and another v CFL and another and other matters
    • Singapore
    • International Commercial Court (Singapore)
    • 31 January 2023
    ...and (c) whether such breach was material enough for the court to set aside the award: Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 (“Triulzi”) at [68]. Hence, as the Seller’s “shortcut” argument has no bearing on the outcome of OS 7, it follows that the Third Partial Awa......
  • Aqz v Ara
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 13 February 2015
    ...Solutions (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Strategic Worldwide Assets Ltd [2014] 3 SLR 562 (refd) Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 (refd) W Co v Dutch Co and Dutch Holding Co [2012] 1 SAA 97 (refd) International Arbitration Act (Cap 143 A, 2002 Rev Ed) ss 2 A (3) , 2 A ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
4 books & journal articles
  • Arbitration
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...is limited in time is considered an award. Reasonable opportunity to be heard 4.47 In Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd[2015]1 SLR 114, the parties entered into a contract where the defendant would purchase washing machines for glass sheets from the plaintiff. The defendant co......
  • Building and Construction Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...to the negligence of the employer: at [224]. Expert evidence in construction arbitration Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 7.83 This case is interesting because it reminds arbitrators and lawyers acting in arbitrations that whereas the procedures in court are ......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2022, March 2022
    • 1 March 2022
    ...of India v TTMI Ltd of England [2005] EWHC 2238 (Comm) at [20]–[25], per Morison J. 48 Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 at [125], per Belinda Ang Saw Ean J (quoted in CBS v CBP [2021] 1 SLR 935 at [51], per Quentin Loh JAD). 49 China Machine New Energy Corp v......
  • Arbitration
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...79 See para 4.42 above. 80 [2008] 2 SLR(R) 491. 81 See para 4.13 above. 82 Citing Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 in support. 83 See para 4.37 above. 84 [2020] 3 SLR 1196. 85 Law Reform and Revision Division, Attorney-General's Chambers Review of Arbitration......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT