Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 30 October 2014 |
| Date | 30 October 2014 |
| Docket Number | Originating Summons No 1114 of 2014 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
22 cases
-
Lao Holdings NV v Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic and another matter
...as the breach was not merely technical or minor, and it refers to the decision in Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 (“Triulzi”) at [54], [64]–[66]. In addition, the plaintiffs say that they have been prejudiced. They submit that the test for prejudice is not h......
-
Lao Holdings NV and another v Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic
...AJU; Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] 4 SLR 1057 (“Quarella”); Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 (“Triulzi”); AQZ v ARA [2015] 2 SLR 972 (“AQZ”) and CBS v CPB [2021] 1 SLR 935 (“CBS”). None of those authorities support the Appellants’ subm......
-
CFJ and another v CFL and another and other matters
...and (c) whether such breach was material enough for the court to set aside the award: Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 (“Triulzi”) at [68]. Hence, as the Seller’s “shortcut” argument has no bearing on the outcome of OS 7, it follows that the Third Partial Awa......
-
CGS v CGT
...at [55], ADG and another v ADI and another matter [2014] 3 SLR 481 (“ADG”) at [112] and Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 (“Triulzi”) at [124]). In ADG, the court stated at [112]: “… the right to be heard too is not unqualified: it is subject to the standard o......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Do Virtual Hearings Without Parties' Agreement Contravene Due Process? The View From Singapore
...and another appeal [2020] SGCA 53. 9 At [81]-82. 10] Jaguar Energy at [96]-97. See also Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 at 11 Jaguar Energy at [104], [111] and [112]. 12 Jaguar Energy at [102] and [167]. 13 Jaguar Energy at [168] and [170]. 14, 15. Jaguar En......
4 books & journal articles
-
Arbitration
...is limited in time is considered an award. Reasonable opportunity to be heard 4.47 In Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd[2015]1 SLR 114, the parties entered into a contract where the defendant would purchase washing machines for glass sheets from the plaintiff. The defendant co......
-
Building and Construction Law
...to the negligence of the employer: at [224]. Expert evidence in construction arbitration Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 7.83 This case is interesting because it reminds arbitrators and lawyers acting in arbitrations that whereas the procedures in court are ......
-
Case Note
...of India v TTMI Ltd of England [2005] EWHC 2238 (Comm) at [20]–[25], per Morison J. 48 Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 at [125], per Belinda Ang Saw Ean J (quoted in CBS v CBP [2021] 1 SLR 935 at [51], per Quentin Loh JAD). 49 China Machine New Energy Corp v......
-
Arbitration
...79 See para 4.42 above. 80 [2008] 2 SLR(R) 491. 81 See para 4.13 above. 82 Citing Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114 in support. 83 See para 4.37 above. 84 [2020] 3 SLR 1196. 85 Law Reform and Revision Division, Attorney-General's Chambers Review of Arbitration......