Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd v Furama Pte Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 27 March 2015 |
| Date | 27 March 2015 |
| Docket Number | Suit No 68 of 2015 (Summons No 512 of 2015) |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v Ok Tedi Mining Ltd
...SLR(R) 737; [2009] 2 SLR 737 (refd) Tan Yok Koon v Tan Choo Suan [2017] 1 SLR 654 (folld) Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd v Furama Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 433 (folld) Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd v Yeo Boong Hua [2018] 2 SLR 655 (folld) Wee Chiaw Sek Anna v Ng Li-Ann Genevieve [2013] 3 SLR 801......
-
SGLN Consultants Pte Ltd v TPC Commercial Pte Ltd
...was neither self-evident nor supported by any provided authority. Indeed, in Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd and others v Furama Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 433 (“Tiananmen KTV”), the High Court held (at [47]) that the “loss of business” and “erosion of customer base” alleged by the plaintiffs in tha......
-
GBN v GBO
...The test for the grant of an interim mandatory injunction is set out in Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd and others v Furama Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 433 at [18] to [22] (“Tiananmen”), which is as follows:- there must be a serious question to be tried; the balance of convenience lies in favour of t......
2 books & journal articles
-
Tort Law
...are not to be granted in an action in the tort of deceit according to the decision in Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd v Furama Pte Ltd[2015] 3 SLR 433. The owner (lessor) of premises stated to the plaintiff (lessee) that the lease would continue as long as the defendant did not redevelop the p......
-
Land Law
...Formalities for agreements for leases 20.1 In Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd v Furama Pte Ltd[2015] 3 SLR 433 (‘Tiananmen KTV’), the plaintiffs, who were tenants of premises owned by the defendant, commenced proceedings against the latter, alleging, inter alia, that the defendant's refusal to......