Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd v Furama Pte Ltd

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date27 March 2015
Date27 March 2015
Docket NumberSuit No 68 of 2015 (Summons No 512 of 2015)
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v Ok Tedi Mining Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • September 30, 2021
    ...SLR(R) 737; [2009] 2 SLR 737 (refd) Tan Yok Koon v Tan Choo Suan [2017] 1 SLR 654 (folld) Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd v Furama Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 433 (folld) Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd v Yeo Boong Hua [2018] 2 SLR 655 (folld) Wee Chiaw Sek Anna v Ng Li-Ann Genevieve [2013] 3 SLR 801......
  • SGLN Consultants Pte Ltd v TPC Commercial Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • February 8, 2024
    ...was neither self-evident nor supported by any provided authority. Indeed, in Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd and others v Furama Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 433 (“Tiananmen KTV”), the High Court held (at [47]) that the “loss of business” and “erosion of customer base” alleged by the plaintiffs in tha......
  • GBN v GBO
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • April 28, 2017
    ...The test for the grant of an interim mandatory injunction is set out in Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd and others v Furama Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 433 at [18] to [22] (“Tiananmen”), which is as follows:- there must be a serious question to be tried; the balance of convenience lies in favour of t......
2 books & journal articles
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2015, December 2015
    • December 1, 2015
    ...are not to be granted in an action in the tort of deceit according to the decision in Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd v Furama Pte Ltd[2015] 3 SLR 433. The owner (lessor) of premises stated to the plaintiff (lessee) that the lease would continue as long as the defendant did not redevelop the p......
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2015, December 2015
    • December 1, 2015
    ...Formalities for agreements for leases 20.1 In Tiananmen KTV (2013) Pte Ltd v Furama Pte Ltd[2015] 3 SLR 433 (‘Tiananmen KTV’), the plaintiffs, who were tenants of premises owned by the defendant, commenced proceedings against the latter, alleging, inter alia, that the defendant's refusal to......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT