The "Sunrise Crane"
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 13 September 2004 |
| Date | 13 September 2004 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 141 of 2003 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 cases
-
Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology Agency
...duty from arising. 57 That the “two-stage process” was only applicable to cases of pure economic loss was confirmed in The Sunrise Crane [2004] 4 SLR 715. In that case, the majority (at [31]–[37]) referred to Man B&W Diesel S E Asia Pte Ltd v PT Bumi International Tankers [2004] 2 SLR 300 (......
-
Sunny Metal and Engineering Pte Ltd v Ng Khim Ming Eric
...3 SLR (R) 29; [1993] 3 SLR 712 (refd) Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Camp 317 (refd) Stovin v Wise [1996] AC 923 (refd) Sunrise Crane, The [2004] 4 SLR (R) 715; [2004] 4 SLR 715 (refd) Sutcliffe v Chippendale & Edmonson (1971) 18 BLR 149 (refd) Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 ......
-
Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology Agency
...on the Caparo three-part test include TV Media Pte Ltd v De Cruz Andrea Heidi and Another Appeal [2004] 3 SLR 543, The "Sunrise Crane" [2004] 4 SLR 715 and PT Bumi (supra Proximity as the determining factor 49 The Court of Appeal based its decision in Ocean Front on the notion of proximity.......
-
Travel Compensation Fund v Robert Tambree T/as R Tambree and Associates
...Caparo approach was recently adopted by the Singapore Court of Appeal: see The Owners of the Sunrise Crane v Cipta Sarana Marine Pty Ltd [2004] SGCA 42 per Yong Pung How CJ and Chao Hick Tin JA; Prakash J dissenting; cf Amirthalingam, ‘ The Sunrise Crane — Shedding New Light or Casting Old ......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Case Note: ESTABLISHING A DUTY OF CARE: SINGAPORE’S SINGLE, TWO-STAGE TEST
...2 SLR 449 at [18]. 63 RSP Architects Planners & Engineers v MCST Plan No 1075 [1999] 2 SLR 449 at [29]—[30]. 64 See The Sunrise Crane[2004] 4 SLR 715; Man B&W Diesel S E Asia Pte Ltd v PT Bumi International Tankers[2004] 2 SLR 300 and United Project Consultants Pte Ltd v Leong Kwok Onn[2005......
-
Tort Law
...AC 660. 152 [1934] 1 KB 191. 153 See, eg, Mohd Sainudin bin Ahmad v Consolidated Hotels Ltd [1990] 2 SLR(R) 787; The Sunrise Crane [2004] 4 SLR(R) 715; Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2297 v Seasons Park Ltd [2005] 2 SLR(R) 613. 154 [2009] QB 725....
-
Tort Law
...claim, the general rule is that the contractual claim prevails: Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd[1995] 2 AC 145 and The Sunrise Crane[2004] 4 SLR 715. 22.96 The claim against the second defendant was based on several grounds, including fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation, failure to......
-
WRITING A PERSUASIVE APPELLATE BRIEF
...of framing issues are common to written submissions. 51 Notable exceptions include: PP v Hla Win[1995] 2 SLR 424; The “Sunrise Crane”[2004] 4 SLR 715; Asia Hotel Investments Ltd v Starwood Asia Pacific Management Pte Ltd[2005] 1 SLR 661; Tan King Hiang v United Engineers (Singapore) Pte Ltd......
Get Started for Free