TBC v TBD
Court | Family Court (Singapore) |
Judge | Lee Li Choon |
Judgment Date | 20 March 2015 |
Neutral Citation | [2015] SGFC 27 |
Citation | [2015] SGFC 27 |
Hearing Date | 29 January 2015 |
Published date | 22 April 2015 |
Docket Number | Divorce No.D 3130 of 2014, MSS 3878/2014, MSS 4310/2014, MSS 4639/2014 |
Plaintiff Counsel | Irvin Chioh, Stephanie Looi [Optimus Chambers LLC] |
Defendant Counsel | Raymond Yeo [Raymond Yeo Advocates & Solicitors] |
Subject Matter | Catchwords: Family Law,maintenance,children,wife |
On 29 January 2015, I heard parties’ 3 applications under MSS 3878/2014, MSS 4310/2014 and MSS 4639/2014 together with 6 other summons applications in divorce suit, D3130/2014. In accordance with rule 115(9) of the Family Justice Rules and by consent of counsel for both parties, the maintenance proceedings before me were conducted in Chambers and without the cross-examination of parties and witnesses. The original Notice of Appeal states that the appeal was in relation to all the orders that I made in respect of the abovementioned applications. Upon a clarification session, the Notice of Appeal was amended with the present appeal being only in relation to my decision in MSS 3878/2014.
The order that I made in relation to MSS 3878/2014 is as follows:
Parties were married on 24 December 2004 in New York, United States of America. They have one child, a daughter, born on 17 February 2006. Parties came to Singapore in March 2011 when the Defendant-husband was posted to Singapore to work. He was then working with XXX and was also a director on the board for XXX International. Due to a restructuring which led to his position being made redundant, he was terminated from his employment in XXX and was removed from the board for XXX International in March 2014.
The Plaintiff-wife and daughter are presently residing at rented premises at River Valley Road. The Defendant-husband left the matrimonial home on 28 April 2013 and is now residing alone at his rented premises.
Divorce suit XXX filed in July 2014 is the wife’s 3rd set of divorce proceedings. The wife’s first set of divorce proceedings was filed on 12 August 2013 (XXX) and the second set of divorce proceedings was filed on 18 December 2013 (XXX). These previous proceedings had to be aborted as the wife could not establish that the Singapore Family Courts have jurisdiction as neither party had fulfilled the domicile requirement at the time of the filing. For the present set of divorce proceedings, parties have agreed to proceed on an uncontested basis for the divorce based on both the wife’s claim of adultery and unreasonable behaviour of the husband and the husband’s counterclaim of the wife’s unreasonable behaviour. On that basis, Interim Judgment had been granted on 25 February 2015.
The wife first lodged a maintenance complaint against the husband on 28 June 2013. Pursuant to this, both parties reached an agreement and the terms of the agreement are set out in the Maintenance Order No. 1042/2013 and recorded by the Court on 13 December 2013. Essentially, the husband was to pay the wife monthly maintenance of $6,000 comprising $4,000 in the form of cash payment, US$800 on the wife’s AMEX credit card, $1000 on the wife’s DBS credit card. In addition, the husband was ordered to pay the following expenses:
To continue reading
Request your trial