Tan Eng Hong v Attorney General
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 2013 |
| Date | 2013 |
| Year | 2013 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Tan Eng Hong v AG
...Eng Hong Plaintiff and Attorney-General Defendant [2013] SGHC 199 Quentin Loh J Originating Summons No 994 of 2010 High Court Constitutional Law—Equal protection of the law—Equality before the law—Interpretation—Whether s 377A Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) was inconsistent with Art 12 (......
-
Lim Meng Suang and another v Attorney-General and another appeal and another matter
... ... As ... we have already mentioned, the present appeals pertain to the constitutionality ... of s 377A. The Appellants are essentially arguing that s 377A violates ... Art 9 and/or Art 12 ... The ... appellant in CA 125/2013, Tan Eng Hong (“Tan”), was arrested on ... 9 March 2010 for engaging in oral sex with a male partner in the ... cubicle of a public toilet. Tan and the male partner were charged ... under s 377A on 2 September 2010 and 1 September 2010 respectively ... Tan filed an application (by way of an originating ... ...
1 books & journal articles
-
JUDGING BETWEEN CONFLICTING EXPERT EVIDENCE
...of Law, Report of the Law Reform Committee on Opinion Evidence (October 2011) at paras 170–171. 37 See Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General[2013] SGHC 199 at [42]. 38[1994] 1 SLR(R) 681. 39Leong Wing Kong v Public Prosecutor[1994] 1 SLR(R) 681 at [15]. 40 Law Reform Committee, Singapore Academy ......