Tan Ah Tee and Another v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 10 October 1979 |
| Date | 10 October 1979 |
| Docket Number | Criminal Appeal No 12 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
48 cases
- Syed Yasser Arafat bin Shaik Mohamed v Public Prosecutor
- Public Prosecutor v Wong Wai Hung and Another
-
Tan Kiam Peng v Public Prosecutor
...of the fact that he was importing controlled drugs into Singapore and/or the nature of the drug in question: see Tan Ah Tee v PP [1978-1979] SLR 211 at 220. Thus, for example, the Court of Appeal in Abdul Ra’uf accepted that the accused could properly contend notwithstanding the statutory p......
-
Public Prosecutor v Kum Chee Cheong
... ... as complies with the requirements of this Part of this Act ... It was held that the onus was on the accused to satisfy the court that he was covered by such insurance when driving and the prosecutor did not have to prove that there was no valid insurance. We next turn to another leading case touching on the same question but the facts were entirely different, namely, R v Edwards .3 There, the accused was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor without a justices` licence contrary to s 160(1)(a) of the Licensing Act 1964. He was unrepresented at the trial and did not ... ...
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Rationalising the burden of establishing defences at criminal law in Singapore: Reconsidering Jayasena, in the wake of Eu Lim Hoklai
...Bin Kamari [1992] SGHC 24; Public Prosecutor v Chan Kim Choi [1988] 2 SLR(R) 611 at [40];Tan Ah Tee and anor v Public Prosecutor [1979-1980] SLR(R) 311 at [15]; Govindasamy N v Public Prosecutor [1974-1976]SLR(R) 654 at [22] to [24]; and Vijayan v Public Prosecutor [1974-1976] SLR(R) 373 at......
-
CULPABILITY IN THE MISUSE OF DRUGS ACT
...the sentence of imprisonment reduced from six months to one month. 65 R v Warner [1969] 2 AC 256. 66 Tan Ah Tee v Public Prosecutor [1979-1980] SLR(R) 311. 67 Tan Kiam Peng v Public Prosecutor [2008] 1 SLR(R) 1 at [129]. 68 In situations where the accused knows that the package contains dru......