Soup Empire Holdings Pte Ltd and others v Lim Cheng San and another matter
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Woo Bih Li JAD |
| Judgment Date | 19 September 2023 |
| Neutral Citation | [2023] SGHC(A) 31 |
| Court | High Court Appellate Division (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 32 of 2023 and Summons No 32 of 2023 |
| Hearing Date | 19 September 2023 |
| Citation | [2023] SGHC(A) 31 |
| Year | 2023 |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Yeo Choon Hsien Leslie (Sterling Law Corporation) |
| Defendant Counsel | Eugene Quah Siew Ping (Matthew Chiong Partnership) |
| Published date | 19 September 2023 |
This is a dispute over whether a director, Lim Cheng San (also known as “Edger”), is to be granted inspection of accounting and other records of three companies pursuant to s 199(3) of the Companies Act 1967 (2020 Rev Ed) (the “Companies Act”). Edger had filed three applications in the High Court against the three companies:
The High Court judge (the “Judge”) granted Edger’s applications. The Companies have appealed. In gist, Edger claims to be entitled to inspect the documents, which have been listed in Annex A of each of the applications, with public accountants by virtue of his office as director of the Companies. He also wishes to inspect the documents because he has been receiving letters or summonses from IRAS for the late payment of taxes and/or the late or non-filing of GST returns by each of the Companies (the “IRAS Matters”).
The Companies argue that Edger was removed as an employee of Soup Empire. Soup Empire had also wanted to remove him as a director but an injunction was granted to prevent Soup Empire from proceeding with a general meeting to do so. Soup Empire alleges that Edger is in reality seeking the inspection of documents to fish for evidence to support an action,
The Companies also allege that the inspection of documents is for another ulterior motive, namely, that Edger has jumped ship to join a competitor and he is seeking to disclose the information in the documents to the competitor. There is some evidence that Edger brought some of the Companies’ bank statements to the office of a third party. There is a counterclaim against Edger and others in S 465 for conspiracy. There is also another action,
As for the IRAS Matters, the Companies argue that there is no misfeasance and suggest that the matters have been or can be easily resolved without inspection.
Relying on the case of
Before continuing and before dealing with an application by Edger to admit fresh evidence, it is useful to bear in mind the background leading to Edger’s applications to inspect. This can be summarised as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations