Sim Lim Finance Ltd v Pelandok Enterprises Pte Ltd and Another
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Judge | Wee Chong Jin CJ |
| Judgment Date | 26 March 1981 |
| Neutral Citation | [1981] SGHC 9 |
| Citation | [1981] SGHC 9 |
| Published date | 19 September 2003 |
| Year | 1981 |
| Docket Number | Suit No 3146 of 1980 |
| Date | 26 March 1981 |
| Subject Matter | O 42 r 12, O 83 r 4 Rules of the Supreme Court 1970,Civil Procedure,Judgments and orders,Judgment in default of appearance,Rate of interest,ss 18(2) 80(2)(i) & First Sch para 7 Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 15) |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Liu Yuen Ming (Lim, Ganesh & Liu) |
| Defendant Counsel | First defendants not represented |
The plaintiffs, a finance company, sued the defendants for monies advanced to the first defendant under a mortgage. They applied for leave to enter judgment under O 83 r 4 against the first defendant in default of appearance for $1,755,691.90 and interest at the rate of $1,024.14 per day from 1 October 1980 until payment.
The application was heard by the Registrar on 10 February 1981 who granted leave to enter judgment for the sum claimed and interest at the rate claimed from 1 October 1980 until the date of judgment and thereafter at 8% per annum. The plaintiffs now appeal contending that they were not only entitled to interest at the rate claimed from 1 October 1980 until the date of judgment but also thereafter at the same rate `until payment`.
Order 42 r 12 of the Rules of the Supreme Court provides:
Every judgment debt shall carry interest at the rate of 8 per centum per annum or at such other rate not exceeding the rate aforesaid as the court directs, such interest to be calculated from the date of judgment until the judgment is satisfied.
Despite this rule the plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to interest at the rate claimed until the judgment debt is satisfied. They rely on s 18(2) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act and para 7 of the First Schedule thereto. Section 18(2)...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
- Tengku Aishah and Others; Wardley Ltd
- Tunku Adnan and Another; Wardley Ltd
-
Wardley Ltd v Tunku Adnan and Another
...(Textiles) Ltd [1976] AC 443 (folld) Popple v Sylvester (1882) 22 Ch D 98 (refd) Sim Lim Finance Ltd v Pelandok Enterprises Pte Ltd [1981-1982] SLR (R) 98; [1980-1981] SLR 527 (not folld) Sneyd, In re; Ex parte Fewings (1883) 25 Ch D 338 (folld) Woodhouse AC Israel Cocoa Ltd SA v Nigerian P......
-
Wardley Ltd v Tengku Aishah and Others
... ... , facilitates the drawdown of the loan stated in one currency in another currency of the borrowers` choice, in this case, Eurocurrency, that is to ... The purpose is to finance the defendants in their purchase of Fremantle Malls. The scheme is to ... O 42 r 12 of the RSC and the decision in Sim Lim Finance Ltd v Pelandok Enterprises Pte Ltd [1981] 1 MLJ 280 to award only 8% on the judgment ... ...