Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | Court of Three Judges (Singapore) |
| Judge | Judith Prakash JA,Belinda Ang Saw Ean J |
| Defendant Counsel | Toh Kian Sing SC, Kok Chee Yeong Jared, Chen Zhida and Wu Junneng (Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP) |
| Subject Matter | Choice of jurisdiction,Jurisdiction,Civil Procedure,Conflict of Laws,Submission,Natural forum,Non-exclusive |
| Date | 13 February 2019 |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Yeo Khirn Hai Alvin SC, Aw Wen Ni, Tan Kia Hua and Lee Yu Lun Darrell (WongPartnership LLP) |
| Hearing Date | 27 September 2018 |
| Published date | 26 February 2019 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 87 of 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Zecha Adam Cornell Lauw Roberts v CSI Sports Network Pte Ltd
...only (see also Jian He at [10]). Here, I am guided by the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] 1 SLR 779 (“Shanghai Turbo”) where the clause in question read as follows: Governing law This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Singapore/......
-
First Property Holdings Pte Ltd v U Myo Nyunt (alias Michael Nyunt )
...arose as an implied term of the JVA, Debenture and Loan Agreement.68 The plaintiff relied on Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] 1 SLR 779 (“Shanghai Turbo”). In that case, the Court of Appeal held (at [84]) that any challenge to the exercise of jurisdiction by the court named ......
-
Chen Yun Hian Christopher v BHNV Online Ltd and others
...such as the present plaintiff has shown strong cause, the following factors are relevant (Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] 1 SLR 779 (“Shanghai Turbo”) at [94]): in what country the evidence on the issues of fact is situated or more readily available, and the effect of that ......
-
Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd v SBM Offshore N V
...r 1 of the ROC; a plaintiff has a “good arguable case” if he has “the better of the argument” (Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] 1 SLR 779 (“Shanghai Turbo”) at [49]; Vinmar Overseas (Singapore) Pte Ltd v PTT International Trading Pte Ltd [2018] 2 SLR 1271 (“Vinmar”) at [45])......
Request a trial to view additional results