Seow Teck Ming and Another v Tan Ah Yeo and Another and another appeal
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 1991 |
| Date | 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Lim Peh Mueh and Others v Kea Shipping Pte Ltd
...have against their solicitors for negligence has been time-barred. See Seow Teck Ming & Anor v Tan Ah Yeo & Anor [1991] SLR 169 , 185; [1991] 2 MLJ 489, 498.Although the Court of Appeal made no order on the plaintiffs` appeal against the decision of Chao Hick Tin JC on his refusal to extend......
-
Lim Jee Tee and Another v Lim Yong Swan
...Rhea' does not apply in the context of the application before me. The defendant also relied on Seow Teck Ming & Anor v Tan Ah Yeo & Ano (1991) 2 MLJ 489. In that case the personal representative of one Tay Kian Ho, deceased, claimed damages against the defendants on behalf of the dependants......
-
Kemira Sdn. Bhd. v Weldone (Sarawak) Sdn. Bhd., 23-11-2007
...where they can be sufficiently compensated by cost or other terms imposed by the court. [See Seow Teck Ming & Anor v Tan Ah Yeo & Anor [1991] 2 MLJ 489]. The power given the court is entirely discretionary. The discretion has to be exercised judicially on proper consideration of the special......
1 books & journal articles
-
SELECTED CASE LAW DEVELOPMENTS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
...3 The amendment took effect under the Supreme Court (Amendment) Act, 1993. 4 [1994] 3 SLR 151, at p 165. 5 Ibid. See Ord 56, r 2(3). 6 [1991] 2 MLJ 489. 7 Ibid, at p 498. Although the case concerned the predecessor of s 34(1)(c), namely, s 34(2), the comments continue to be valid in relatio......