Public Prosecutor v Wong Siu Fai
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 16 May 2002 |
| Date | 16 May 2002 |
| Docket Number | Criminal Case No 26 of 2002 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
Annis bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor
...the sentences imposed in similar cases. 84 In sentencing the appellant, the district judge relied on three cases – PP v Wong Siu Fai [2002] 3 SLR 276, Adam bin Darsin v PP [2001] 2 SLR 412 and PP v Peh Thian Hui [2002] 3 SLR 268 – in which sentences of five years’ imprisonment were imposed ......
-
Annis Bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor
...DPP cited the three cases involving acts of fellatio carried out by or performed on victims of a young age, namely, PP v Wong Siu Fai [2002] 3 SLR 276, Adam bin Darsin v PP [2001] 2 SLR 412 and PP v Peh Thian Jui and Ors [2002] 3 SLR 268. The offenders pleaded guilty in those cases and were......
-
Public Prosecutor v Balwant Singh s/o Jhanda Singh
...(CC14/1999); PP v Izan bin Othman (1) & Kamisah bte Hassan (2) (CC31/2003); Adam Bin Darsin v PP [2001] 2 SLR 413; PP v Wong Siu Fai [2002] 3 SLR 276; PP v Abdul Hamed bin Yahya (CC60/2003); PP v Lim Beng Cheok [2004] 1 SLR 48; PP v Siddharth Mujumdar (CC44/2002); PP v Bostam bin Rom (CC9/2......
-
Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Zam bin Abdul Rashid
...indicated a lack of planning in the commission of the offence. As stated by Choo Han Teck JC (as he then was) in PP v Wong Siu Fai [2002] 3 SLR 276 at [6], intoxication, though of no exculpatory value, was nonetheless indicative of an absence of a planned modus operandi. Dr Stephen Phang op......
Get Started for Free