Public Prosecutor v Tan Kim Seng Construction Pte Ltd and Another

JurisdictionSingapore
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
Judgment Date03 June 1997
Docket NumberMagistrate's Appeal No 195 of 1996
Date03 June 1997

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
33 cases
  • Chai Chien Wei Kelvin v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 16 October 1998
    ..., the `dangers of falsification and inaccuracy` were recognised and highlighted (at p 157). In PP v Tan Kim Seng Construction Pte Ltd [1997] 3 SLR 158 at pp 167-168, the court gave some guidance as to the factors to be considered in according weight to a statement admissible in evidence by ......
  • Selvarajan James v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 August 2000
    ... ... anybody leave the premises without the authorisation of the warehouse executive, one Lee Chen Seng Michael, who had been tipped off that Kanan was `up to something`. However, Kanan told the security ... `P9` and `P10`) - one on 23 January 1998, the day after the offence was committed and another on 24 March 1999, after his conviction under s 381 of the Penal Code - stating categorically that ... In the case of PP v Tan Kim Seng Construction Pte Ltd & Anor [1997] 3 SLR 158 , I said that, in addition to the above, other factors that ... ...
  • Pandiyan Thanaraju Rogers v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 18 June 2001
    ... ... (6) of the EA and elaborated in Selvarajan James v PP [2000] 3 SLR 750 , PP v Tan Kim Seng Construction [1997] 3 SLR 158 and Chai Chien Wei Kelvin v PP [1999] 1 SLR 25 ... These ... ...
  • Public Prosecutor v Heah Lian Khin
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 1 August 2000
    ... ... `a combination of statements, ideas, or features of a situation which are opposed to one another` while a discrepancy is `an illogical or surprising lack of compatibility or similarity between two ... phrase `previous inconsistent or contradictory statement`, the court `will prefer a construction which advances this object rather than one which attempts some way of circumventing it`: Bennion ... to be governed by the safeguards set out in s 147(6) and the factors set out in PP v Tan Kim Seng Construction Pte Ltd [1997] 3 SLR 158 at [para ] 27-31; approved in Chai Chien Wei Kelvin v ... ...
  • Get Started for Free