Public Prosecutor v Heng Chiou Tian

CourtDistrict Court (Singapore)
JudgeWong Keen Onn
Judgment Date31 August 2005
Neutral Citation[2005] SGDC 184
Citation[2005] SGDC 184
Publication Date07 October 2005
Plaintiff CounselASP Kishore Rai and ASP Bernard Pong
Defendant CounselChia Boon Teck (Chia Yeo and Partnership)
SubjectCriminal Law,Offences,Property,Criminal breach of trust by agent,Accused, an executive director of a company, retaining for himself money received by him from sale of company goods,Sentence,Section 409 Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed),Criminal Procedure and Sentencing,Sentencing,Principles,Aggravating factors,Substantial amount of money misappropriated,Accused abusing high degree of trust reposed in him by fellow company directors,Offence committed over a long period of time,Small amount of restitution,Similar charges taken into account for sentencing purposes,Whether aggravating factors outweighing mitigating factors,Mitigating factors,First offence,Accused having no criminal record,Serious offence committed,Lack of antecedents only amounting to neutral factor in face of need for deterrence,Plea of guilt,Accused pleading guilty to charge,Strong evidence against accused,Weight to be given to plea of guilt,Public service,Accused contributing to charitable causes over the years,Such actions not falling within category of distinguished public service or services of substantial value to the nation or community,Weight to be given to charitable donations,Surrendering to police and co-operating with police,Accused surrendering to police and co-operating with them after being unable to repay to company the money taken by him,Weight to be given to accused's actions

31 August 2005

District Judge Wong Keen Onn

1 This is an appeal against sentence by the accused. The accused pleaded guilty before me to one charge of criminal breach of trust as an agent under section 409 of the Penal Code, namely:

“DAC 25096/05 (First charge)(Exhibit P1)

You, Heng Chiou Tian, Male/42 Years, NRIC No: S 1616333/C, are charged that you, between 2003 and 2004 in Singapore, being the Executive Director of the One Transmission Pte Ltd (Reg No: 200304478M) (“the Company”), and in such capacity as an agent of the Company, being entrusted with funds of the Company, did commit an offence of criminal breach of trust, when you dishonestly misappropriated $24,429.30 in cash, being proceeds from the sale of goods by the Company to five of its customers, particulars of which are annexed in the schedule hereto and form part of this charge, and you have thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 409 of the Penal Code (Chapter 224, 1985 Revised Edition).

2 Upon his conviction on the charge, the accused consented to 2 similar counts of committing criminal breach of trust as an agent under Section 409 of the Penal Code be taken into consideration for the purpose of sentencing. He was sentenced to 20 months’ imprisonment.


3. The accused admitted to the Statement of Facts (Exhibit B) without qualifications. The material portions of the Statement of Facts are reproduced below:

1. … ……….

2. At the material time, between 2003 and 2004, the accused (Heng Chiou Tian, male 42 years old) was the Executive Director of The One Transmission Pte Ltd, registration number 200304778M, (the “Company”) and was left to oversee the entire operations and day to day running of the Company. The Accused was thus entrusted with the funds of Company, as an agent of the Company.

3. The investigations carried out by the Commercial Affairs Department revealed that between 2003 and 2004, the Accused received a total of $24,429.30 in cash from five of the Company’s customers as listed below:



Invoice Date

Invoice Amount

Amount received

Duta Teknik

I 352-003

I 3002-0603

I 3007-0603

I 3018-0703










K. P. P.
Industech Control

I 3088-0204




PT. Jupiter Mitra Setia

I 3029-0903

I 3104-0404








I 3100-0404




Terang Mitra

I 3085-0204






4. The monies the Accused had received were proceeds from the sale of goods by the Company to the five customers, which rightfully belonged to the Company and should have been banked into the Company’s accounts the following day. However, the Accused the said cash and kept the monies for himself.

5. The Accused had therefore committed an offence of criminal breach of trust under Section 409 of the Penal Code (Chapter 224, 1985 Revised Edition) by dishonestly misappropriating the said $24,429.30.

6. The Accused admitted dishonestly misappropriating the said cash whilst being employed as an Executive Director of the said company”.


4. The accused is forty-two years of age and is a first offender. He has two children, aged 4 and 6 years, and his wife is an Indonesian. He had pleaded guilty at the first opportunity. As for the circumstances leading to the commission of the offences concerned, the accused informed the court that he had taken the money from the company but “had intended to return them in good time without prejudice to the company”. However, he was not able to do so subsequently. Thereafter he informed his fellow directors and entered into a written agreement to repay to the company. According to counsel, the accused surrendered to the police on 15 February 2005 as he was overcomed with guilt and remorse. This was after the accused had agreed to repay the company. Between July and December 2004, the accused had only managed to make restitution of $9,114. In...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT