PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA
Jurisdiction | Singapore |
Judgment Date | 01 December 2006 |
Date | 01 December 2006 |
Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 127 of 2005 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
89 cases
-
Beijing Sinozonto Mining Investment Company Ltd v Goldenray Consortium (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...IMC Aviation Solutions Pty Ltd v Altain Khuder LLC (2011) 282 ALR 717 (refd) PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA [2007] 1 SLR (R) 597; [2007] 1 SLR 597 (folld) Quek Tiong Kheng v Chang Choong Khoon Mark [2012] SGDC 76 (refd) R v Exall (1866) 4 F & F 922; 176 ER 850 (refd) R......
-
Aju v Ajt
...of natural justice or some other recognised vitiating factor: at [65]. (2) In PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA [2007] 1 SLR (R) 597 at [53]- [57], it was held that even if an arbitral tribunal's findings of law and/or fact were wrong, such errors would not per se engage ......
-
Lao Holdings NV v Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic
...v PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK [2011] 4 SLR 305 (“CRW”) at [30], citing PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA [2007] 1 SLR(R) 597 (“PT Asuransi”) at [40] and [44]. Under that inquiry, the court must first ascertain what matters were within the scope of submission to......
-
Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels Inc. v Global Gaming Philippines LLC
...[1991] SLR 188 (folld) Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan [2010] SGHC 35 (folld) PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA [2007] 1 SLR(R) 597; [2007] 1 SLR 597 (folld) PT First Media TBK v Astro Nusantara International BV [2014] 1 SLR 372 (refd) PT Pukuafu Indah v Newmont Indones......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court of Appeal: Narrow scope of public policy ground for challenging arbitral awards reaffirmed
...the forum's most basic notions of morality" (per the Singapore Court of Appeal in PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA [2007] 1 SLR(R) 597) are set aside and/or not enforced. It should not be used as a basis to revisit and second guess findings of fact made by an arbitral tr......
-
Non-disclosure in international commercial arbitration: the High Court of Singapore offers guidance
...any documents that are relevant to the case (adverse or not).10 Footnotes 1PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA [2007] 1 SLR(R) 597, 622 2 Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Pte Ltd v Exim Rajathi India Pvt Ltd [2010] 1 SLR 573, 597 [64]. 3 Dongwoo Mann+Hummel Co Ltd v Man......
14 books & journal articles
-
Arbitration
...J declined to set aside the award. She followed the Court of Appeal”s call in PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA[2007] 1 SLR 597 that the public policy ground should only be applied where ‘upholding … an arbitral award would “shock the conscience”… or [would be] clearly in......
-
LEADING THE WAY FOR THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL MEDIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS
...words applies with equal logical force to the Singapore Convention as well. See PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA [2007] 1 SLR(R) 597 at [59]; AJU v AJT [2011] 4 SLR 739 and Renusagar Power Co Ltd v General Electric Co AIR 1994 SC 860 at [63]. 178 PT Asuransi Jasa Indones......
-
SURVEY OF SINGAPORE ARBITRATION CASE LAW ON CONFLICT OF LAWS ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
...sometimes decisive in international commercial disputes”. 20 [2011] 4 SLR 739. 21PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA[2007] 1 SLR(R) 597 at [59]. 22 Whether there is a substantive difference between the two is debatable: see Paul Tan, “AJU v AJT— Nail in Soleimany's Coffin?”......
-
Arbitration
...does at times give rise to issues or confusion. The Court of Appeal had in PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v Dexia Bank SA[2007] 1 SLR(R) 597 (‘PT Asuransi’) made a clear statement on the substance-procedure distinction of an award and an order. Decisions on interlocutory matters perta......
Request a trial to view additional results