PP; Sim Ah Cheoh and Others

JurisdictionSingapore
Date1991
Year1991
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Chai Chien Wei Kelvin v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 16 Octubre 1998
    ...Inducement, threat or promise 45.As s 122 CPC is not applicable to narcotics officers (see, eg Sim Ah Cheoh v PP [1991] SLR 150 [1991] 2 MLJ 353 and Tan Siew Chay v PP [1993] 2 SLR 14), the admissibility of the first accused`s statements fall to be tested under s 24 of the Evidence Act. The......
  • Heng Kwee Huang v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 20 Mayo 2002
    ...open mind on the accuracy and veracity of the evidence adduced by the Prosecution: Haw Tua Tau v PP [1981] 2 MLJ 49, Sim Ah Cheoh v PP [1991] 2 MLJ 353, PP v Gan Lim Soon [1993] 3 SLR 261, Ng Theng Shuang v PP [1995] 2 SLR 36, PP v IC Automation (S) Pte Ltd [1996] 3 SLR 249. With such a Pro......
  • Public Prosecutor v Yeow Beng Chye
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 28 Febrero 2003
    ...open mind on the accuracy and veracity of the evidence adduced by the Prosecution: Haw Tua Tau v PP [1981] 2 MLJ 49, Sim Ah Cheoh v PP [1991] 2 MLJ 353, PP v Gan Lim Soon [1993] 3 SLR 261, Ng Theng Shuang v PP [1995] 2 SLR 36, PP v IC Automation (S) Pte Ltd [1996] 3 SLR 80 In the circumstan......
  • Public Prosecutor v L Hassan and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 31 Octubre 1998
    ...questions inadmissible (Lau Song Seng & Ors v Public Prosecutor [1998] 1 SLR 663 at 675 read with Sim Ah Cheoh & Ors v Public Prosecutor [1991] 2 MLJ 353 at 361). Self-perceived inducement (and by parity of reasoning self perceived threat) could not in law amount to a vitiating factor withi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • STATEMENTS UNDER SECTION 122 (6) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (CPC): SOME OBSERVATIONS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1991, December 1991
    • 1 Diciembre 1991
    ...Tuck Wah v. P.P. [1991] 3 MLJ 404. If a 122 (6) statement is admitted, should it not be capable of being evidence for all purposes? 15 [1991] 2 MLJ 353. Incidentally, Wong Kam-Ming v. R(1980) AC 247 remains ‘strong persuasive authority’ for the view that an accused should not be cross-exami......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT