Perwira Affin Bank Berhad (formerly known as Perwira Habib Bank Malaysia Berhad) v Lee Hai Pey and another

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date21 May 2007
Date21 May 2007
Docket NumberOriginating Summons No 1054 of
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Madihill Development Sdn Bhd v Sinesinga Sdn Bhd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 Octubre 2011
    ...443 (refd) Perwira Ariffin Bank Bhd v Lee Hai Pey [1997] 2 SLR (R) 498; [1998] 1 SLR 357 (refd) Perwira Affin Bank Bhd v Lee Hai Pey [2007] 3 SLR (R) 218; [2007] 3 SLR 218 (refd) Poh Soon Kiat v Desert Palace Inc [2010] 1 SLR 1129 (refd) Vadala v Lawes (1890) 25 QBD 310 (refd) Vasiliy Golov......
  • Madihill Development Sdn Bhd and another v Sinesinga Sdn Bhd (transferee to part of the assets of United Merchant Finance Bhd)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 Octubre 2011
    ...case relied upon by Mr Chua, Perwira Affin Bank Bhd (formerly known as Perwira Habib Bank Malaysia Bhd) v Lee Hai Pey and another [2007] 3 SLR(R) 218, involved the same parties. By now, the appeals against the enforceability of the Malaysian judgment had come to an end. Judith Prakash J hel......
  • Mann Holdings Pte Ltd v Ung Yoke Hong, 29-01-2019
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 29 Enero 2019
    ...the same; see for instance Perwira Affin Bank Berhad (Formerly known as Perwira Habib Bank Malaysia Berhad v Lee Hai Pey & Another [2007] 3 SLR 218; Madihill Development Sdn Bhd & Another v Sinesinga Sdn (Transferee to part of the assets of United Merchant Finance Bhd [2012] 1 SLR 169; DHL ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 Diciembre 2007
    ...7.41 For the three reported cases in 2007 which dealt with foreign judgments, two cases, namely, Perwira Affin Bank v Lee Hai Pey[2007] 3 SLR 218 and Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport-SDPR[2007] 1 SLR 501, dealt with whether it was ‘just and convenient’ under s 3(1) of the Reciprocal En......
  • Conflict of Laws
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 Diciembre 2007
    ...that Judgment 1265 was time barred since it was an in rem judgment. 9.58 The second case was Perwira Affin Bank Bhd v Lee Hai Pey[2007] 3 SLR 218. This case involved the plaintiff bank, the defendant guarantor and a 20-year saga of the bank attempting to register and enforce a Malaysian jud......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT