Permina 108, The (Ibnu)

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date1977
Date1977
Year1977
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Span Terza, The (Neptunia)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 November 1981
    ... ... been considered in two courts in the Far East , one in Singapore in a case called The Permina , (1978) 1 Lloyd's Reports, page 308 , where the decision arrived at was the one that I have ... ...
  • MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company SA v Owners of the ship 'Tychi' [QBD (Admiralty)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • 31 March 1999
    ... ... Maritime Trader, TheUNK [1981] 2 Ll Rep 153 ... Permina 108, TheUNK [1978] 1 Ll Rep 311 ... Policon Ltd v Owners of Ship “Lloyd ... ...
  • Ciel Y Cia S.a. v The Owners Of The Vessel "Sextum" Ex "Ercole Lauro"
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 28 May 1982
    ...99 (2) (1976) 1 W.L.R. 430 (3) (1971) Probate 137 (4) (1973) 1 Q.B. 265 (5) (1976) 2 Q.B. 116 (6) (1981) 2 Lloyd's Rep. 153 (7) (1978) 1 Lloyd's Rep. 311 (8) (1982) 1 Lloyd's Rep. 225 Representation: Robert Ribeiro Esq. instructed by (J.S.M.) for the Plaintiffs. William Waung Esq. instructe......
  • Owners Of Cargo Lately Laden On Board The Ship "Riau" v The Owners Of "Djatianom" And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 13 October 1982
    ...cases cited by counsel in which the points before me have been raised and argued. Both points were raised in the "Permina 108" (1978) 1 Lloyd's Law Reports 311. In this case the Court was dealing with a vessel which had been arrested in connection with a claim brought against the owners the......
2 books & journal articles
  • IN PERSONAM LIABILITY, BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AND THE ACTION IN REM
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...P. 78 and “The Daien Mam No. 18”[1985] 2 M.L.J. 90. 3 See “The Ocean Jade”[1991] 2 M.L.J. 385 at 389 and “The Permina 108”[1977] 1 M.L.J. 49. 4 The provision reads: “In the case of any such claim as is mentioned in section 3(1)(d) to (q), being a claim arising in connection with a ship, whe......
  • CLAIMS FALLING WITHIN SECTION 3(1)(H) OF THE HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT AND THE RIGHT OF ARREST
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 December 1997
    ...1 All ER 920 at 927e. Italics added by the writer. For the sake of completeness, it is pertinent to point out that in The Permina 108[1977] 1 MLJ 49 at 51, the Singapore Court of Appeal explained that this passage of Lord Diplock’s judgment in The Jade was directed at the right of arrest of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT