Neo Man Lee v Public Prosecutor

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeGoh Joon Seng J
Judgment Date30 May 1991
Neutral Citation[1991] SGCA 13
Docket NumberCriminal Appeal No 10 of 1989
Date30 May 1991
Year1991
Published date19 September 2003
Plaintiff CounselAppellant in person
Citation[1991] SGCA 13
Defendant CounselJasvender Kaur (Deputy Public Prosecutor)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Subject MatterAccused suffering from chronic schizophrenia,Life imprisonment,Conviction on charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder,Whether sentence of life imprisonment justified,Sentencing,Criminal Procedure and Sentencing,Forms of punishment,s 304(a) Penal Code (Cap 224)

Cur Adv Vult

The appellant was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment with effect from 27 September 1984 on a charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, an offence punishable under s 304 of the Penal Code (Cap 224). He appealed against sentence.

On 4 September 1984 at the Westpeak Condothe appellant stabbed a 29-year-old woman and caused her death.
The deceased had been in the swimming pool of the condominium together with her husband, nephews and niece. At about 8.45pm she came out of the swimming pool and went to the ladies` changing room to change. In the changing room, she was attacked by the appellant with a knife. Another resident of Westpeak Condominium was near the swimming pool at the time and heard the deceased scream. He ran towards the entrance of the changing room and saw the appellant running out naked. He attempted to strike the appellant with a squash racket which he was carrying, and was stabbed by the appellant on his chin and his left hand. The appellant then fled.

The deceased had in all 21 injuries - three stab wounds, five bruises, 12 incised wounds and some loss of skin on her nose.
The fatal injury was a stab would in her left chest which penetrated the left lung to a depth of 7.5cm to 8.5cm. The cause of death was certified to be `left haemothorax due to stab wound of the left lung`.

The appellant was arrested on 27 September 1984.
After a trial which stretched from 3 October 1988 to 25 May 1989 he was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under s 304(a) of the Penal Code with effect from the date of his arrest. Section 304 reads as follows:

Whoever commits culpable homicide not amounting to murder shall be punished:

(a) with imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine or to caning, if the act by which death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death; or

(b) with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years, or with fine, or with both, if the act is done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause death, but without any intention to cause death, or to cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death.



Before he was charged at the commencement of the trial, the appellant was medically examined by a psychiatrist at the request of his counsel and the psychiatrist was of the opinion that he was mentally fit to stand
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 Diciembre 2004
    ...before sentencing a young offender to life imprisonment. 11.104 The Court of Appeal noted that the local courts in Neo Man Lee v PP[1991] SLR 146 had broadly endorsed the conditions justifying life imprisonment as set out in R v Hodgson(1968) 52 Cr App R 113: (a) The offence or offences are......
  • Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2001, December 2001
    • 1 Diciembre 2001
    ...All three offenders were sentenced to life imprisonment. 11.82 The decision of the then Court of Criminal Appeal in Neo Man Lee v PP[1991] SLR 146 was the starting point of discussion on this issue. In Neo Man Lee the accused, who suffered from chronic schizophrenia, was convicted and sente......
  • SENTENCING MENTALLY DISORDERED OFFENDERS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...125 of the Prisons Regulations (Cap 247, Rg 2, 2002 Rev Ed). 101 (1968) 52 Cr App R 113 at 114 approvingly cited in Neo Man Lee v PP [1991] 1 SLR(R) 918. 102 See, eg, PP v Lim Hock Hin [2002] 2 SLR(R) 447 (where a man slashed his mother to death with a knife in an epileptic seizure); Purwan......
  • Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 Diciembre 2003
    ...to sentence is inapplicable where serious offences are concerned, especially where the public safety is at risk: see Neo Man Lee v PP[1991] SLR 146, involving the sentence of an appellant convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, whose mental condition made it likely that he m......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT