Mansoor s/o Abdullah and Another v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 09 September 1998 |
| Date | 09 September 1998 |
| Docket Number | Criminal Appeal No 2 of 1998 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Zailani bin Ahmad v Public Prosecutor
...to satisfy the court that he was indeed suffering from diminished responsibility at the time of the offence: Mansoor s/o Abdullah v PP [1998] 3 SLR 719; and Tengku Jonaris Badlishah v PP [1999] 2 SLR 260 (“Tengku Jonaris”) at [35]. They (a) The appellant must have been suffering from an abn......
-
Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan v PP
...[1993] 2 SLR(R) 754, Asokan v Public Prosecutor [1995] 1 SLR(R) 936 and Mansoor s/o Abdullah and another v Public Prosecutor [1998] 3 SLR(R) 403). In respect of all these cases, it can be said that there was evidence on which, if the Barendra test had been applied, it would have been possib......
-
Ong Chee Hoe and Another v Public Prosecutor
... ... of and applied by the Singapore courts [see Suradet v PP [1993] 3 SLR 265 , Ibrahim bin Masod v PP [1993] 3 SLR 873 , Mansoor s/o Abdullah v PP [1998] 3 SLR 719 , Too Yin Sheong v PP (supra) and Shaiful Edham bin Adam v PP [1999] 2 SLR 57 ]. Whether there is ... ...
-
Tengku Jonaris Badlishah v Public Prosecutor
... ... In Mansoor s/o Abdullah & Anor v PP [1998] 3 SLR 719 , it was stated that there are three limbs to this ... with getting a Rolex watch for Saifon did not amount to an obsession, which is another symptom of dysthymia. Dr Tsoi was of the view that this preoccupation on the appellant`s part could ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Law
...him of diminished responsibility. This test had been advocated by several earlier courts: for example, see Mansoor s/o Abdullah v PP[1998] 3 SLR 719; Tengku Jonaris Badlishah v PP[1999] 2 SLR 260. It requires the accused to prove on the balance of probabilities that: (a) he was suffering fr......
-
DIMINISHED RESPONSIBILITY: A LESS VINDICATORY EXCUSE THAN PROVOCATION
...The level of proof for the whole defence — all three limbs — is one of a balance of probabilities. See also Mansoor s/o Abdullah v PP[1998] 3 SLR 719 at [13]; Lim Chin Chong v PP[1998] 2 SLR 794 at [34]. 3 [1960] 2 QB 396 (“R v Byrne”). See Stanley Yeo, “Improving the Determination of Dimin......