Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor
Jurisdiction | Singapore |
Judge | Choo Han Teck J |
Judgment Date | 28 October 2010 |
Neutral Citation | [2010] SGHC 320 |
Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Docket Number | Magistrate’s Appeal No 184 of 2010 (DAC No 62538 and 62539 of 2009) |
Year | 2010 |
Published date | 29 October 2010 |
Hearing Date | 15 October 2010,18 October 2010 |
Plaintiff Counsel | Appellant in-person |
Defendant Counsel | Mohamed Faizal (Deputy Public Prosecutor) |
Citation | [2010] SGHC 320 |
The appellant was taken to the Bedok Police Station on 17 July 2009 when he was arrested and charged for the offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt, an offence under s 325 of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed). When asked to have his finger impressions and photograph taken, he refused. He was thus charged under s 13(2)(a) of the Registration of Criminals Act (Cap 268, 1985 Rev Ed) (“the Act”). He also refused to provide a blood sample when requested to do so. For this he was charged under s 13E(5)(a) of the Act. The appellant was tried and at the end of the five-day trial he was convicted on both charges and was fined $500 on each charge. The appellant appealed against the convictions but not on the sentences imposed.
At the appeal before me, DPP Mr Mohamed Faizal conceded that the conviction regarding the charge under s 13E(5)(a) cannot be sustained because certain procedure was not complied with. Under ss 13C(1) and (2) of the Act, if a person without good cause refuses to provide a blood sample, that person may be taken before a Magistrate who may then make an order for that person’s blood to be taken. Such an order was, however, not obtained and so it could not be said that the appellant had been “lawfully required” to provide his blood sample. Section 13E(5)(a) of the Act was thus not applicable. Sections 13C(1) and (2) of the Act provide as follows:
(5) Where a person from whom a body sample is lawfully required under this Part refuses, without reasonable excuse, to give the sample or to allow the sample to be taken from him, or otherwise hinders or obstructs the taking of the sample from him —
(a) that person shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,000 or to imprisonment for...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mah Kiat Seng v PP
...have his finger impressions and photograph taken. The Judge’s decision in MA 184/2010 can be found at Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGHC 320 (“MKS v PP (MA)”). MKS then applied to the High Court in Criminal Motion No 42 of 2010 (“CM 42/2010”) to reserve 22 questions of law of pub......
-
Mah Kiat Seng v
...first and dismissed the other. The facts and my grounds of decision of those appeals are set out in Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor [2010] SGHC 320. The relevant facts of this application concerned his refusal to give his finger impressions to the police after he was arrested on suspicion......