Loo See Mei v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 2004 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Year | 2004 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Loo See Mei v PP
...See Mei Plaintiff and Public Prosecutor Defendant [2004] SGHC 42 Yong Pung How CJ Magistrate's Appeal No 120 of 2003 High Court Evidence–Witnesses–Corroboration–Whether necessary–Evidence–Witnesses–Examination–Failure to call certain witnesses–Whether court should draw adverse inference aga......
-
Public Prosecutor v Lim Pei Ni Charissa
...not falsely implicate the Accused is one of “beyond reasonable doubt”. It did not have to prove this beyond all doubt: Loo See Mei v PP [2004] SGHC 42 @ para 64. After careful consideration, I rejected the Defence’s submission that Loo had been pressured into falsely incriminating the Accus......
-
Public Prosecutor v Ong Ting Ting
...not falsely implicate the Accused is one of “beyond reasonable doubt”. It did not have to prove this beyond all doubt: Loo See Mei v PP [2004] SGHC 42 @ para 92. In this case, I found that there was no reason for Jean to falsely incriminate the Accused. After all, according to the Accused: ......
-
Public Prosecutor v Lim Hong Kheng and Another
...into any of these category of witnesses. Therefore, corroboration of her evidence was not necessary (see the case of Loo See Mei v PP [2004] SGHC 42). 74 A preliminary point was raised by the prosecution on the third day that PW3 was giving her evidence, that there were possibilities of ina......
Request a trial to view additional results