Iskandar bin Muhamad Nordin v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Judgment Date | 04 November 2005 |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Appeal No 90 of 2005 |
| Date | 04 November 2005 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Teo Seng Tiong v Public Prosecutor
...shows that his previous sentences did not have sufficient deterrent effect on him: Iskandar bin Muhamad Nordin v Public Prosecutor [2006] 1 SLR(R) 265 at [21]. An offender’s criminal record may attest to his bad character, poor attitude and low likelihood of rehabilitation: Sim Yeow Seng v ......
-
Pp v Asr
...inconsistent with the approach set out above is the High Court’s decision in Iskandar bin Muhamad Nordin v Public Prosecutor [2006] 1 SLR(R) 265 (“Iskandar”). The accused in that case was an 18-year-old male with an IQ of 58. He pleaded guilty to a charge of outrage of modesty under s 354 o......
-
Public Prosecutor v Low Ji Qing
...antecedent record. Hence, in ASR at [127], the Court of Appeal considered the case of Iskandar bin Muhamad Nordin v Public Prosecutor [2006] 1 SLR(R) 265 (“Iskandar”). The Court of Appeal alluded to the High Court’s decision to increase the offender’s sentence to 24 months’ imprisonment and......
-
Public Prosecutor v Hsu Yisong
...as a mitigating factor, if any, depends on the particular circumstances of the case: Iskandar bin Muhamad Nordin v Pubic Prosecutor [2006] 1 SLR(R) 265 at [14].22 Cooperation with the Authorities, Character References, and No Prior Antecedents. I considered the Accused’s cooperation with th......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...Seng Tiong v Public Prosecutor [2021] 2 SLR 642 at [97]–[98], affirming, inter alia, Iskandar bin Muhamad Nordin v Public Prosecutor [2006] 1 SLR(R) 265; Public Prosecutor v Fernando Payagala Waduge Malitha Kumar [2007] 2 SLR(R) 334; and Public Prosecutor v NF [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849. 84 [2021]......