Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd (Direct Services (HK) Ltd, Third Party)
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Judgment Date | 21 February 2006 |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Court Suit No 16197 (Registrar's Appeal from the Subordinate Courts No 25 of 2005) |
| Date | 21 February 2006 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 cases
-
Lee Hsien Loong v Singapore Democratic Party
...supporting particulars, must be pleaded and proved like any other fact (see Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd [2006] 2 SLR 268 (“Emjay”)). It was decided in Emjay (at [31]) that O 18 r 13(4) of the Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2004 Rev Ed) (“the 2004 ROC”) did not ......
-
Sun Technosystems Pte Ltd v Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd
...the Singapore High Court decision of Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd (Direct Services (HK) Ltd, Third Party) [2006] 2 SLR 268 (“Emjay Enterprises”), as follows (at The legal effect of [the decision of the House of Lords in Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transpor......
-
Kay Lim Construction & Trading Pte Ltd v Soon Douglas (Pte) Ltd
...Piling Pte Ltd v Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd [2011] 1 SLR 246 (refd) Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd [2006] 2 SLR (R) 268; [2006] 2 SLR 268 (refd) Forefront Medical Technology (Pte) Ltd v Modern-Pak Pte Ltd [2006] 1 SLR (R) 927; [2006] 1 SLR 927 (refd) Fras......
-
Seiko Epson Corporation v Sepoms Technology PTE Ltd
...of patent infringement should be explored at the outset. As observed in Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd [2006] 2 SLR 268 (“Emjay”) (at The line between theory and practice is often a fine one and, in any event, one ought never to gainsay the role that rigorous the......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...accepted by the High Court in Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd (Direct Services (HK) Ltd, third party)[2006] 2 SLR(R) 268 (‘Emjay Enterprises’) – was raised in a few cases in 2012. In Kay Lim Construction & Trading Pte Ltd v Soon Douglas (Pte) Ltd[2013] 1 SLR 1 (‘K......
-
Civil Procedure
...as long as the applicable limitation period has not expired (at [16]). 7.69 In Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd[2006] 2 SLR 268, the High Court did not permit a defence to be amended for the purpose of the assessment of damages (interlocutory judgment had already b......
-
Contract Law
...exception and limitation clauses were considered in the High Court decision of Emjay Enterprises Pte Ltd v Skylift Consolidator (Pte) Ltd[2006] 2 SLR 268. The issue before the court was whether a contracting party could argue that an exception clause could nevertheless be introduced at the ......