Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date28 May 2004
Date28 May 2004
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 130 of 2003
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Lacey v Zion and Sea Shells Reefs Ltd
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • High Court (Antigua)
    • 6 February 2007
    ...the “ Purchase Money Mortgage. See G. Scammell and Nephew. Limited v. H.C. and J.G. Ouston [1941] A.C. 251 and Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd. v. Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd. [2005] 2 L.R.C. 136. 22. The first defendant submits that having regard to Clauses 3 and 9 of the Agreement, the pa......
  • Lai Ling Wan v Commissioner of Stamp Duties
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 August 2011
    ...at [17] to [19], [22] and [23]. AG v Cohen [1937] 1 KB 478 (refd) Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd [2004] 3 SLR (R) 316; [2004] 3 SLR 316 (folld) Comptroller of Income Tax v GE Pacific Pte Ltd [1994] 2 SLR (R) 948; [1994] 2 SLR 690 (folld) Ng Swee Lang v Sassoon......
  • Sea-Shore Transportation Pte Ltd v Technik-Soil (Asia) Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 24 October 2018
    ...acceptance of a contract must be sufficiently clear and unequivocal (Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd [2004] 3 SLR(R) 316 at [36]; Midlink Development Pte Ltd v The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd [2004] 4 SLR(R) 258 at [48]–[52]). Whilst Technik-Soil may have, in the ......
  • Seraya Energy Pte Ltd v Denka Advantech Pte Ltd and another suit (YTL PowerSeraya Pte Ltd, third party)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 2 January 2019
    ...on the parties. Denka relied on the decision of the Court of Appeal in Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd [2004] 3 SLR(R) 316 (“Compaq Computer”). I will refer to the appellant there as “Compaq” and the respondent there as “CIS”. In that case, CIS was the plaintif......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 December 2004
    ...for instance, Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd[2005] 1 SLR 502, Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd[2004] 3 SLR 316, Chia Ee Lin Evelyn v Teh Guek Ngor Engelin[2004] 4 SLR 330 (which has been affirmed on appeal — see Teh Guek Ngor Engelin née Tan v Chia E......
  • RESOLVING AMBIGUITY THROUGH EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...2 Lloyd’s Rep 601 at 619, per Lloyd LJ. 11 [2002] 1 All ER (Comm) 737. 12 Supra n 4. 13 [2000] 3 SLR 341. 14 [2003] 3 SLR 362. 15 [2004] 3 SLR 316 (“Compaq Computer”). 16 [2004] SGHC 194. 17 Ibid at [42]. 18 Id at [56]. 19 Thoresen & Co (Bangkok) Ltd v Fathom Marine Company Ltd [2004] 1 Llo......
  • Building and Construction Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 December 2004
    ...the full contract has not been finalised and executed. 5.5 The case of Compaq Computer Asia Pte Ltd v Computer Interface (S) Pte Ltd[2004] 3 SLR 316 offers a useful reminder of how the period after the letter of award and before finalisation of contract terms will be analysed. The main issu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT