Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Date | 2014 |
| Year | 2014 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun
...Yuen Lan Plaintiff and See Fong Mun Defendant [2014] SGCA 36 Sundaresh Menon CJ , Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA and V K Rajah JA Civil Appeal No 64 of 2013 Court of Appeal Trusts—Constructive trusts—Common intention constructive trusts—Whether common intention constructive trust should be prim......
-
Primecredit Ltd v Yeung Chun Pang Barry And Another
...doctrines on resulting trust is to be preferred : see a discussion of this topic in the Singapore case of Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun [2014] SGCA 36 at paragraphs [38]‑[52] referred to in Mo Ying v Brillex Development Ltd [2015] 2 HKLRD 985 at paragraph 2.9. It is not necessary in this jud......
-
Mo Ying v Brillex Development Ltd And Another
...therefrom.’ (emphasis added) 4) Other jurisdiction 6.13 It is of note that the Singapore Court of Appeal in Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun [2014] SGCA 36 (a case not cited by the parties) after reviewing Stack and Jones, chose not to follow the constructive trust approach but instead chose to......
-
Gayah v Gayah-Cheeranjie et Al
...SUBMISSION 118 The claimant at a very late stage sort to bring to the Court's attention the case of Chan Yuen Lan v. See Fong Mun (2014) SGCA 36, a case from the Singapore Court of Appeal. This case according to the claimant, reviews the current UK position and in particular comments on the......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE (QUISTCLOSE) RESULTING TRUST AS A PROPRIETARY RESPONSE TO UNJUST ENRICHMENT
...ed) (Oxford University Press, 2004) at para 4.254. 42[2008] 2 SLR(R) 108. 43(1984) 155 CLR 242. 44 See now Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun[2014] SGCA 36 at [43], where the Court of Appeal clarified that Lau Siew Kim v Yeo Guan Chye Terence[2008] 2 SLR(R) 108 cannot be interpreted in this way. ......