Barbury (Panama) SA and Another v Cross Oceanic Navigational Services Pte Ltd; The Enfield

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date28 May 1982
Date28 May 1982
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 29 of 1981
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
The “Enfield”

[1982] SGCA 22

Wee Chong Jin CJ

,

Lai Kew Chai J

and

T Kulasekaram J

Civil Appeal No 29 of 1981

Court of Appeal

Admiralty and Shipping–Admiralty jurisdiction and arrest–Action in rem–Arrest of vessel as security for disbursement claim–Sale of ship and transfer of ownership before arrest–Whether court had admiralty jurisdiction over ship–Section 4 (4) (1) (a) High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 6, 1970 Rev Ed)

On 15 May 1980, the respondent arrested the motor vesselEnfield as security for its claim of disbursement which it incurred as the owner's agent in Madras in February, March and April 1980.

The appellant applied to set aside the respondent's writ and all proceedings thereunder, on the ground that the ownership of the Enfield had been transferred from Enfield Shipping Corp SA to Barbury (Panama) SA (“Barbury”) since the accrual of the causes of action. As such the requirements of s 4 (4) (1) (a) of the High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 6, 1970 Rev Ed) had not been complied with. The High Court dismissed the appellant's application and it appealed.

Held, dismissing the appeal:

(1) The purported sale of the vessel to Barbury was a device and a sham designed to defraud claimants such as the respondent so that the vessel as a security was put out of its reach: at [7].

(2) The court was entitled to look at the transactions and determine the true beneficial ownership of the vessel. The evidence amply confirmed that Barbury did not carry the true face of a corporate bona fide purchaser and Enfield Shipping Corp SA was at all material times the beneficial owner of the vessel: at [8].

Aventicum, The [1978] 1 Lloyd's Rep 184 (refd)

Maritime Trader, The [1981] 2 Lloyd's Rep 153 (refd)

High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 6, 1970 Rev Ed)s 4 (4) (1) (a) (consd)

Lo Kok Siong (Allen & Gledhill) for the appellants

S Selvadurai (Selvadurai, Pala Krishnan & Partners) for the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
1 books & journal articles
  • IN PERSONAM LIABILITY, BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AND THE ACTION IN REM
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...379. 104 [1993] 3 S.L.R. 521 at 531. 105 [1986] H.K.L.R, 346. 106 At [1994] 3 S.L.R. 379 at 387. 107 [1982] 2 M.L.J. 108 at 110. 108 [1982] 2 M.L.J. 106. 109 Ibid. 110 [1982] 2 M.L.J, 106 at 108. 111 Ibid. 112 For other decisions of the Singapore Court of appeal on the issue of beneficial o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT