Advocate and Solicitor, Re an; ex parte Law Society of Singapore for Judicial Review
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Date | 1987 |
| Year | 1987 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Law Society of Singapore v Lee Wei Ling
...there was no prima facie case with respect to the First Complaint: at [50] to [53]. Case(s) referred to Advocate and Solicitor, Re An [1987] 2 MLJ 21 (distd) Iskandar bin Rahmat v Law Society of Singapore [2021] 1 SLR 874, CA (refd) Iskandar bin Rahmat v Law Society of Singapore [2022] 1 SL......
-
Law Society of Singapore v Lee Wei Ling and another
...Tan Cheng Bock framework. In the course of the arguments and submissions, reference was made to Iskandar I, Re An Advocate and Solicitor [1987] 2 MLJ 21 (“Re An Advocate and Solicitor”), and Law Society of Singapore v Chia Shih Ching James [1983–1984] SLR(R) 596 (“James Chia”). In our judgm......
1 books & journal articles
-
WINDS OF CHANGE: DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE LEGAL PROFESSION (AMENDMENT) ACT 19931
...42 See section 88(5). 43 In this respect, In re an Advocate and Solicitor; Ex Parte The Law Society of Singaporefor Judicial Review[1987] 2 MLJ 21, is still good law to the extent that the investigative role of the Disciplinary Committee was spelt out. See also Whitehouse Holdings Pte Ltd v......