Abdul Rahim v British and Malaya Trustees Ltd

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date30 September 1966
Date30 September 1966
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No Y9 of 1966
CourtFederal Court (Singapore)
Abdul Rahim
Plaintiff
and
British & Malayan Trustees Ltd
Defendant

[1966] SGFC 8

Wee Chong Jin CJ

,

Tan Ah Tah FJ

and

F A Chua J

Civil Appeal No Y9 of 1966

Federal Court

Land–Licences–Termination–Damages–Landlord and Tenant–Creation of tenancy–Contract–Contract described as tenancy agreement–Whether tenancy or licence created

The former trustees of the settlement entered into an agreement with the appellant and another person, both described collectively as “the tenant”, purporting to grant them a monthly tenancy at a rent of $40 per month of premises. Under the agreement either party might determine the tenancy with one month's notice in writing.

The trial judge concluded that the agreement created merely a licence, and the tenant's right to use the premises had determined. No damages were however awarded.

On appeal by the appellant, it was argued that a tenancy had been created. The new trustees cross-appealed arguing that damages should have been awarded.

Held, dismissing the appeal and allowing the cross-appeal:

(1) In determining whether an agreement creates between the parties the relationship of landlord and tenant or merely that of licensor and licensee, the intention of the parties is the paramount consideration. The intention of the parties must be sought not from the mere words of the agreement but from its substance and from the conduct of the parties and the surrounding circumstances: at [7].

(2) As the effect of the agreement was clearly to grant the tenant space on the wall to put up a display for their wares, there was no relationship of landlord and tenant. Instead, the tenant had only a personal privilege with no interest in land, which was terminable by one month's notice in writing: at [8], [9] and [10].

(3) The respondent should be awarded damages for the appellant's overstay at $40 per month until recovery of possession: at...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Assoland Pte Ltd; Tan Swee Eng
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1988
  • Goh Gin Chye and Another v Peck Teck Kian Realty Pte Ltd and Another
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 9 April 1987
    ... ... agreement under which the premises were let to the trustees - the principles applicable in resolving a question of this ... though producing the opposite result, in the case of Abdul Rahim v British And Malaya Trustees Ltd [1967] 1 MLJ 118 ... ...
  • Tan Swee Eng v Assoland Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 23 April 1987
    ... ... agreement under which the premises were let to the trustees - the principles applicable in resolving a question of this ... : Re Tan Tye Deceased [1966] 2 MLJ 107 and Abdul Rahim v British And Malaya Trustees Ltd [1967] 1 MLJ ... ...