AAE v AAF
Judge | Belinda Ang Saw Ean J |
Judgment Date | 28 April 2009 |
Neutral Citation | [2009] SGHC 104 |
Citation | [2009] SGHC 104 |
Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Published date | 13 May 2009 |
Defendant Counsel | Tay Choon Leng John and Gregory Fong (John Tay & Co) |
Subject Matter | Whether presumption of legitimacy in s 114 Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed) operated where paternity not in dispute,Whether property purchased with proceeds of pre-marriage assets considered matrimonial assets,Family court,Whether husband liable to maintain non-biological child whom he had treated as child of family,Ancillary powers of court,Family Law |
Plaintiff Counsel | Loh Wai Mooi (Bih Li & Lee) |
28 April 2009 |
|
Belinda Ang Saw Ean J:
2 The ancillary orders made on 24 September 2008 were as follows:
(a) The division of the matrimonial assets shall be in the following ratio:
(d) No maintenance is payable by the Husband to the Wife.
(e) No maintenance is payable by the Husband to the Wife for the maintenance of the Child.
(f) The Wife shall have custody, care and control of the Child.
(g) The Wife shall move out of the [XXX] property within four months from 24 September 2008.
(h) The Wife shall pay the Husband costs fixed at $8,000
3 The Wife has appealed against the ancillary orders. I now publish the reasons for my decision.
Matrimonial assets
(i) The [XXX] and [YYY] properties
8 Ms Loh’s argument centred on the authority of Chen Siew Hwee v Low Kee Guan (Wong Yong Yee, co-respondent)
According to Judith Prakash J in the Singapore High Court decision of Ang Teng Siong v Lee Su Min
[Emphasis in original]
To continue reading
Request your trial