ZO v ZP
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 25 May 2011 |
| Date | 25 May 2011 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeals Nos 94 and 96 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
65 cases
-
WKM v WKN
...or not to employ this process is a matter for the court to decide in the exercise of its discretion. In ZO v ZP and another appeal [2011] 3 SLR 647 (“ZO”), this court acknowledged that judicial interviews were an important avenue for the views of children to be taken into account (at [15]):......
-
Goh Keng Boey v Ong Jim Hwee
...the temptation to lapse into a minute scrutiny of the conduct and efforts of both spouses” (NK v NL [2007] 3 SLR (R) 743). In ZO v ZP [2011] 3 SLR 647, the Court of Appeal further emphasized that direct and indirect contributions are to be given due weight and no single factor is determinat......
-
VWM v VWN
...or circumstances necessitating a sole custody order (see CX v CY [2005] 3 SLR(R) 690 (“CX”) at [36] to [38]; ZO v ZP and another appeal [2011] 3 SLR 647 at paragraph 2 of the headnote). As to what would constitute such exceptional circumstances, this is a fairly high threshold which would i......
-
VYG v VYH
...The age at which the child’s views should be considered is not fixed. In the Court of Appeal decision in ZO v ZP and another appeal [2011] 3 SLR 647, Andrew Phang JA considered that the views of the children aged 16, 13 and nine years of age could be taken into consideration on the issue of......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
CUSTODY ISSUES – DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN CIVIL AND SYARIAH COURTS IN SINGAPORE
...they shared with multiple agencies through data analytics and insights, their programmes and processes. 129 Cap 353, 2009 Rev Ed; ZO v ZP[2011] 3 SLR 647. 130[2016] SGHCF 1. 131 See paras 42–46 above. 132(2009) 3 SSAR 174. 133 David Hodson, “When Religion Meets Family Law: Aspect of the Eng......
-
Family Law
...This case is yet another development in the new family justice landscape mentioned above and a natural extension of cases such as ZO v ZP[2011] 3 SLR 647 (which held (at [15]) that in applications to vary custody orders, the views of the children should be taken into account by way of judic......
-
Family Law
...to the children's upbringing. Nor was an order for sole custody, as the Court of Appeal had confirmed in recent cases such as ZO v ZP[2011]3 SLR 647 that the threshold established in CX v CY is indeed a highone. In the circumstances, conditional joint custody was perhaps the most logical op......
-
Family Law
...Custody of children 15.7 Six years after the landmark decision in CX v CY[2005] 3 SLR(R) 690 (CX v CY), the Court of Appeal in ZO v ZP[2011] 3 SLR 647 (ZO (CA)) stressed the importance of the principles enunciated therein. The High Court decision of ZP v ZO[2010] SGHC 364 was criticised in ......
Request a trial to view additional results