ZO v ZP
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
| Judgment Date | 25 May 2011 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeals Nos 94 and 96 |
| Date | 25 May 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
63 cases
-
Goh Keng Boey v Ong Jim Hwee
...the temptation to lapse into a minute scrutiny of the conduct and efforts of both spouses” (NK v NL [2007] 3 SLR (R) 743). In ZO v ZP [2011] 3 SLR 647, the Court of Appeal further emphasized that direct and indirect contributions are to be given due weight and no single factor is determinat......
-
VWM v VWN
...or circumstances necessitating a sole custody order (see CX v CY [2005] 3 SLR(R) 690 (“CX”) at [36] to [38]; ZO v ZP and another appeal [2011] 3 SLR 647 at paragraph 2 of the headnote). As to what would constitute such exceptional circumstances, this is a fairly high threshold which would i......
-
VYG v VYH
...The age at which the child’s views should be considered is not fixed. In the Court of Appeal decision in ZO v ZP and another appeal [2011] 3 SLR 647, Andrew Phang JA considered that the views of the children aged 16, 13 and nine years of age could be taken into consideration on the issue of......
-
TFU v TFV
...112(2) requires the Court to consider all the circumstances of the case and the factors listed therein. In ZO v ZP and another appeal [2011] SGCA 25, the Court of Appeal held that both direct and indirect contributions are to be given due weight and no single factor is determinative of the ......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Family Law
...This case is yet another development in the new family justice landscape mentioned above and a natural extension of cases such as ZO v ZP[2011] 3 SLR 647 (which held (at [15]) that in applications to vary custody orders, the views of the children should be taken into account by way of judic......
-
Family Law
...to the children's upbringing. Nor was an order for sole custody, as the Court of Appeal had confirmed in recent cases such as ZO v ZP[2011]3 SLR 647 that the threshold established in CX v CY is indeed a highone. In the circumstances, conditional joint custody was perhaps the most logical op......
-
Family Law
...Custody of children 15.7 Six years after the landmark decision in CX v CY[2005] 3 SLR(R) 690 (CX v CY), the Court of Appeal in ZO v ZP[2011] 3 SLR 647 (ZO (CA)) stressed the importance of the principles enunciated therein. The High Court decision of ZP v ZO[2010] SGHC 364 was criticised in ......
-
Muslim Law
...an aside, it ought to be noted that this is aligned to the position taken by the civil courts in Singapore: see in this regard ZO v ZP[2011] 3 SLR 647. As the Appeal Board observed (Abdul Bashir at [19]) (after stating its general agreement with the proportions of matrimonial assets ascribe......
