Wu Yang Construction Group Ltd v Mao Yong Hui and another

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date13 December 2007
Date13 December 2007
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 60 of 2006
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 cases
  • Multi-Code Electronics Industries (M) Bhd v Toh Chun Toh Gordon
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 November 2008
    ...the court. (h) The defendants also relied on the Court of Appeal decision in Wu Yang Construction Group Ltd v Mao Yong Hui and Another [2008] 2 SLR 350 (“Wu Yang”) where the court said at The law is clear. If no substantive relief is claimed against a party, a freezing order cannot be issue......
4 books & journal articles
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...2008. However, the judgment was unreported. 7.49 In a similar vein, the Court of Appeal in Wu Yang Construction Group Ltd v Mao Yong Hui[2008] 2 SLR 350 reaffirmed the holding in Swift-Fortune Ltd v Magnifica Marine SA[2007] 1 SLR 629 that, if no substantive relief is claimed against a part......
  • REFORMING COMPANY LAW IN SINGAPORE *
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...Rev Ed) s 14. 81 See, eg, Intraco Ltd v Multi-Pak Singapore Pte Ltd[1994] 3 SLR(R) 1064; Wu Yang Construction Group Ltd v Mao Yong Hui[2008] 2 SLR(R) 350. Both are decisions of the Court of Appeal. 82 Report of the Steering Committee for Review of the Companies Act (2011) Recommendation 3.2......
  • Case Note: INTERIM MEASURES IN AID OF FOREIGN ARBITRATION — A RE-THINK1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...accompanying nn 34 and 35. 39 [2007] 1 SLR 629 at [61]. 40 [2007] 1 SLR 629 at [44]. 41 [2006] 1 SLR 112. 42 [2007] 1 SLR 629 at [4]. 43 [2007] SGCA 55 at [29]. 44 Re Unisoft Group Ltd (No 1); Saunderson Holdings v Unisoft Group Ltd [1993] BCLC 1292. 45 Similar positions were adopted in Gid......
  • Company Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...of the trial and thus he was only allowed 65% of his costs. Financial assistance 8.20 In Wu Yang Construction Group Ltd v Mao Yong Hui[2008] 2 SLR 350, the Court of Appeal had to consider issues relating to financial assistance under s 76 of the Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed). The appe......