Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date25 May 2015
Date25 May 2015
Docket NumberSuit No 1186 of 2013 (Registrar's Appeals Nos 134 and 136 of 2014)
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • The “Yue You 902”
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 24 Abril 2019
    ...UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd [2006] 1 SLR(R) 1; [2006] 1 SLR 1 (folld) Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim [2015] 4 SLR 250 (refd) Ythan, The [2006] 1 Lloyd's Rep 457 (not folld) Facts The plaintiff, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd (“OCBC”) had extended a ......
  • The "Yue You 902" and another matter
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 24 Abril 2019
    ...a real or bona fide defence in relation to the issues that he says ought to be tried (see Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim [2015] 4 SLR 250 at [36], JP Choon Pte Ltd v Lal Offshore Marine Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 115 at [14] and Sim Kim Seng (trading as Kim Seng Ship Building) v New ......
  • Quek Jin Oon v Goh Chin Soon
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 Noviembre 2020
    ...be granted, the applicable legal principles are helpfully canvassed by Coomaraswamy J in Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim [2015] 4 SLR 250 (at [81]): The classic formulation is that conditional leave to defend is the appropriate order when the defendant has succeeded in showing ......
  • Millennium Commodity Trading Ltd v BS Tech Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 Marzo 2017
    ...to conclude that the defendant’s defence, though triable, was shadowy. Thus, applying Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim [2015] 4 SLR 250 (“Wee Cheng Swee Henry”), the assistant registrar granted the defendant leave to defend conditional upon furnishing security for the plaintiff’......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 Diciembre 2015
    ...public interest to do so. (This decision is currently on appeal.) Summary judgment 8.135 In Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim[2015] 4 SLR 250, the High Court took the opportunity to reaffirm the summary judgment process. First, the plaintiff has to show a prima facie case for sum......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT