Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 25 May 2015 |
| Date | 25 May 2015 |
| Docket Number | Suit No 1186 of 2013 (Registrar's Appeals Nos 134 and 136 of 2014) |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 cases
-
The “Yue You 902”
...UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd [2006] 1 SLR(R) 1; [2006] 1 SLR 1 (folld) Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim [2015] 4 SLR 250 (refd) Ythan, The [2006] 1 Lloyd's Rep 457 (not folld) Facts The plaintiff, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd (“OCBC”) had extended a ......
-
The "Yue You 902" and another matter
...a real or bona fide defence in relation to the issues that he says ought to be tried (see Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim [2015] 4 SLR 250 at [36], JP Choon Pte Ltd v Lal Offshore Marine Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 115 at [14] and Sim Kim Seng (trading as Kim Seng Ship Building) v New ......
-
Quek Jin Oon v Goh Chin Soon
...be granted, the applicable legal principles are helpfully canvassed by Coomaraswamy J in Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim [2015] 4 SLR 250 (at [81]): The classic formulation is that conditional leave to defend is the appropriate order when the defendant has succeeded in showing ......
-
Millennium Commodity Trading Ltd v BS Tech Pte Ltd
...to conclude that the defendant’s defence, though triable, was shadowy. Thus, applying Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim [2015] 4 SLR 250 (“Wee Cheng Swee Henry”), the assistant registrar granted the defendant leave to defend conditional upon furnishing security for the plaintiff’......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...public interest to do so. (This decision is currently on appeal.) Summary judgment 8.135 In Wee Cheng Swee Henry v Jo Baby Kartika Polim[2015] 4 SLR 250, the High Court took the opportunity to reaffirm the summary judgment process. First, the plaintiff has to show a prima facie case for sum......