Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc.
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 29 June 2009 |
| Date | 29 June 2009 |
| Docket Number | Originating Summons No 844 of 2008 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
21 cases
-
Ozone Community Corporation v Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
...[2009] 4 SLR (R) 498 ( MediaCorp ). Order 87 r 4 (2) of the ROC was also covered in Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR (R) 577 (which was subsequently affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No 46 of 2009) although neither Future Enterprises nor MediaCorp w......
-
Doctor's Associates Inc. v Lim Eng Wah
...that the “first syllable principle” should not be applied in a “blanket fashion” (Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 at [34], citing London Lubricants (1920) Ltd’s Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 at 279). The defendant averred that the marks are dissimilar bec......
-
Martek Biosciences Corporation v Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd
...News Pte Ltd v Astro All Asia Networks Plc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 496 (“MediaCorp”) and Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 (“Valentino”). Nature of ‘Rehearing’ under O 87 and O 87A ROC MediaCorp was an appeal by MediaCorp pursuant to s 8(2)(b) and s 8(3) of the Tra......
-
PP v Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop
...SGHC 268 at [46]; Loo See Mei v Public Prosecutor [2004] 2 SLR(R) 27 at [53]–[54]; and Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 at [69]. Most importantly, we note the following observations by Yong Pung How CJ in the Singapore High Court decision of Mohamed Abdull......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Intellectual Property Law
...322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed). 73 Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd [2017] 2 SLR 308 at [15]. 74 Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed. 75 [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 at [11], referred to in Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd [2017] 2 SLR 308 at [16]. 76 Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone S......