Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc.

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date29 June 2009
Date29 June 2009
Docket NumberOriginating Summons No 844 of 2008
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
21 cases
  • Ozone Community Corporation v Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 15 Enero 2010
    ...[2009] 4 SLR (R) 498 ( MediaCorp ). Order 87 r 4 (2) of the ROC was also covered in Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR (R) 577 (which was subsequently affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No 46 of 2009) although neither Future Enterprises nor MediaCorp w......
  • Doctor's Associates Inc. v Lim Eng Wah
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 18 Abril 2012
    ...that the “first syllable principle” should not be applied in a “blanket fashion” (Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 at [34], citing London Lubricants (1920) Ltd’s Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 at 279). The defendant averred that the marks are dissimilar bec......
  • Martek Biosciences Corporation v Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 Mayo 2010
    ...News Pte Ltd v Astro All Asia Networks Plc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 496 (“MediaCorp”) and Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 (“Valentino”). Nature of ‘Rehearing’ under O 87 and O 87A ROC MediaCorp was an appeal by MediaCorp pursuant to s 8(2)(b) and s 8(3) of the Tra......
  • PP v Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 11 Marzo 2015
    ...SGHC 268 at [46]; Loo See Mei v Public Prosecutor [2004] 2 SLR(R) 27 at [53]–[54]; and Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 at [69]. Most importantly, we note the following observations by Yong Pung How CJ in the Singapore High Court decision of Mohamed Abdull......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual Property Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed). 73 Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd [2017] 2 SLR 308 at [15]. 74 Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed. 75 [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 at [11], referred to in Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd [2017] 2 SLR 308 at [16]. 76 Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT