United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad

JurisdictionSingapore
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Judgment Date23 October 2006
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 81 of 2005
Date23 October 2006

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 cases
  • Chua June Ching Michelle v Chai Hoi Tong
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 29 July 2011
    ...AC 809 (refd) Tan Ah Suan v Ng Aik Kern [2002] 2 SLR (R) 1135; [2002] 4 SLR 708 (refd) United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad [2006] 4 SLR (R) 884; [2006] 4 SLR 884 (folld) Western Australia v Ward (2002) 213 CLR 1 (refd) Control of Rent Act (Cap 58, 1985 Rev Ed) Land Titles Act 1993 ......
  • Malayan Banking Berhad v Sivakolunthu Thirunavukarasu and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 28 September 2007
    ...present action came on for hearing before me, the Court of Appeal delivered its decision in United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad [2006] 4 SLR 884 (“UOB v Bebe No 2”). Chan Sek Keong CJ who delivered the judgment of the Court, undertook a thorough review of the facts, the trial judge......
  • Ukm v Ag
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 December 2018
    ...[2016] 1 SLR 779 (refd) Thain, Re [1926] Ch 676 (folld) TSH v TSE [2017] SGHCF 21 (folld) United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad [2006] 4 SLR(R) 884; [2006] 4 SLR 884 (refd) W, Re [1998] Fam 58 (refd) Walton v Scottish Ministers [2013] PTSR 51 (refd) Wan Yijun, Re [1990] 2 SLR(R) 157;......
  • Asal Anggun Development Sdn Bhd v Amiruddin bin Abdul Rahman and Another
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2019
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...affirmed. Indefeasibility of title and interests 18.7 The decision of the Court of Appeal in United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad[2006] 4 SLR 884 was applied in resolving the question of the indefeasibility of a transfer and mortgage procured by fraud in Malayan Banking Bhd v Sivako......
  • TAKING STOCK OF THE CHANGE OF POSITION DEFENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...Sedley LJ. 92Niru Battery Manufacturing v Milestone (No 1)[2004] QB 985 at 1012, per Sedley LJ. See also United Overseas Bank v Bebe[2006] 4 SLR(R) 884 in the context of Torrens fraud. 93Niru Battery Manufacturing Co v Milestone Trading Ltd[2004] 2 All ER (Comm) 705 at 741, [135], per Moore......
  • WRITING A PERSUASIVE APPELLATE BRIEF
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...more than blockbuster in their approach, preferring instead to wait for a suitable case (see United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad[2006] 4 SLR 884, where the Court of Appeal refrained from overruling a prior decision until the issue was raised directly by the facts). As the court in ......
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...acquisition. The most prominent decision is undoubtedly that of the Court of Appeal in United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad[2006] 4 SLR 884, which clarifies the law on several aspects of the principle of indefeasibility, such as the power of the court to rectify the land register on......
  • Get Started for Free