Tjong Mark Edward v PP
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 06 April 2015 |
| Date | 06 April 2015 |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Appeal No 167 of 2014/01-02 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v Irene Koh Limbert
...gratifications and the acts the gratifications were intended to reward: Leng Kah Poh [at [22]; Tjong Mark Edward v PP and another appeal [2015] 3 SLR 375 (“Mark Tjong”) at [16] citing Tey Tsun Hang v PP [2014] 2 SLR 1189 (“Tey Tsun Hang”) at [17]. In the latter case, Woo J had stated: 17 Al......
-
Public Prosecutor v Wong Chee Meng and another appeal
...by Wong and Chia to be of much assistance. The first case cited by Wong is Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2015] 3 SLR 375 (“Tjong”). The accused person, who was the director of business development of ST Electronics (Info-Software Systems) Pte Ltd, was charged wit......
-
Public Prosecutor v Wong Chee Meng and others
...over whether any action would be taken or forborne to be taken as a result of his corrupt act. In the case of Tjong Mark Edward v PP [2015] 3 SLR 375, Justice Tay Yong Kwang distilled the following factors from Marzuki’s case and the case of PP v Ang Seng Thor [2011] 4 SLR 217 (“Ang Seng Th......
-
Public Prosecutor v Wan Wei Hong
...even though they have distinct conceptual aspects, as seen in PP v Leng Kah Poh [2014] 4 SLR 1264 at [22] and Tjong Mark Edward v PP [2015] 3 SLR 375 at [16]. Factor (b) involves an objective assessment of whether there was a corrupt element in the loans, based on the ordinary standard of a......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Law
...Rev Ed). Corruption: Section 6(a), Prevention of Corruption Act (Cap 241, 1993 Rev Ed) 13.48 In Tjong Mark Edward v Public Prosecutor[2015] 3 SLR 375 (‘Tjong Mark Edward’), the appellant agent was charged with two counts of corruptly obtaining gratification under s 6(a) of the PCA. The foll......