The "Soeraya Emas"
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 13 September 1991 |
| Date | 13 September 1991 |
| Docket Number | Admiralty in Rem No 51 of 1989 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
The ‘Engedi’
...taken and the intervener had difficulty in meeting that condition. The intervener drew my attention to the case of The “Soeraya Emas” [1991] 2 SLR(R) 479 to support the proposition that the in rem claim could be heard separately from the in personam claim. In that case, the defendant shipow......
-
The “Echo Star” ex “Gas Infinity”
...is obtained by the plaintiff, it may be enforced in rem against the ship and in personam against the defendant (The Soeraya Emas [1991] 2 SLR(R) 479 at [28]-[30]; The Fierbinti [1994] 3 SLR(R) 574 at [12]). This principle also applies to a claim subject to a damage lien mutatis mutandis. I ......
-
THE HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED vs The Owners and/or the Demise Charterers of, and/or other persons interested in the ship “SEA CORALâ€
...The 1st Intervener also relied on The “Byzantion” [1922] 12 Lloyd’s Law Rep 9, Pemunya Kapal MV Brihope [supra] and The “Soeraya Emas [1992] 1 SLR 33 to support this The 1st Intervener further contended that its direct interest as the registered owner of the Vessel would be adversely affect......
-
The "Miracle Hope"
...and protect their interests by defending the action, irrespective of whether the defendant enters an appearance. In The “Soeraya Emas” [1991] 2 SLR(R) 479, an intervener applied to set aside a consent summary judgment entered into by the plaintiff mortgagee and the defendant shipowner, who ......