Tey Tsun Hang v AG

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date01 December 2014
Date01 December 2014
Docket NumberOriginating Summons No 512 of 2014 (Summons No 3987 of 2014)
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Attorney-General
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 4 May 2018
    ...appeal procedure to the Minister” as provided for under the Planning Act (at [29]). In the decision of Tey Tsun Hang v Attorney-General [2015] 1 SLR 856 (“Tey Tsun Hang”), the applicant brought judicial review proceedings against the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority of Singapore (“the ......
  • Madan Mohan Singh v AG
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 25 February 2015
    ...Ltd v John Laing Construction Ltd [1983] QB 398, albeit in the context of time-barred claims. In Tey Tsun Hang v Attorney-General [2015] 1 SLR 856 at [37], it was held that this applies equally to the three-month time limit in O 53 r 1(6) of the Rules of Court. Order 53 r 1(6) of the Rules ......
  • Tan Wee Tin and others v Singapore Swimming Club
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 23 November 2017
    ...under s 22 of the Planning Act (Cap 232, 1998 Rev Ed) before coming to court (Borissik at [30]). In Tey Tsun Hang v Attorney-General [2015] 1 SLR 856 (“Tey Tsun Hang”), the applicant brought judicial review proceedings against the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority of Singapore regarding......
4 books & journal articles
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...SGHCR 21 at [32]. 37 See Borissik Svetlana v Urban Redevelopment Authority [2009] 4 SLR(R) 92 and Tey Tsun Hang v Attorney-General [2015] 1 SLR 856. 38 [2012] EWHC 2080 (Admin) at [33]. 39 [2014] 1 SLR 1047. 40 Chiu Teng @ Kallang Pte Ltd v Singapore Land Authority [2014] 1 SLR 1047 at [34]......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...As a result, the court ordered a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration. Striking out 8.90 In Tey Tsun Hang v Attorney-General[2015] 1 SLR 856 (tey tsun hang), the High Court heard cross applications for (a) striking out; and (b) leave to apply for judicial review, on the basis that t......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...is appealing against conviction, that a PR is not generally granted a REP until the matter is concluded: Tey Tsun Hangv Attorney-General[2015] 1 SLR 856 (Tey Tsun Hang) at [28]. A REP is required for a PR who leaves Singapore to return to Singapore as a PR under s 11 of the Immigration Act.......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...[89]. 68 [2009] 4 SLR(R) 92. 69 Cap 232, 1998 Rev Ed. Borissik Svetlana v Urban Redevelopment Authority [2009] 4 SLR(R) 92 at [29]. 70 [2015] 1 SLR 856. 71 Cap 133, 2008 Rev Ed. 72 Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Attorney-General [2018] SGHC 112 at [92]. 73 Tey Tsun Hang v Attorney-General......