TEK v TEL
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Eugene Tay |
| Judgment Date | 21 September 2015 |
| Neutral Citation | [2015] SGFC 117 |
| Court | Family Court (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | Divorce No. 4733/2013, FC/SUM 375/2015 & FC/SUM 909/2015 |
| Year | 2015 |
| Published date | 03 November 2015 |
| Hearing Date | 08 June 2015 |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Ms Carrie Gill (with legal executive) (M/s Harry Elias Partnership LLP) |
| Defendant Counsel | Mr Lai Swee Fung & Mr Eric Low (with attachment student) (M/s Unilegal LLC) |
| Citation | [2015] SGFC 117 |
This judgment arises out of the appeal by the Defendant husband (“Husband”) against my decision to make no order on FC/SUM 375/2015 (“the Husband’s Application”), which was heard on 8 June 2015 together with the cross application taken out by the Plaintiff wife (“Wife”) in FC/SUM 909/2015 (“the Wife’s Application”). I also made no order on the Wife’s Application. There was no cross appeal filed by the Wife.
BackgroundParties were married in 2010. They have one child of the marriage, a four year old son born in 2011 (“the Child”).
On or about 6 June 2013, the Husband filed an originating summons in OSF No. 249/2013/G (“the OS”) seeking joint custody, as well as care and control of the Child, with consequential access orders. After two (2) sessions of mediation on 3 September 2013 and 5 September 2013 (collectively, “the Mediation”) conducted by the mediation judge (“Mediation Judge”), the following orders were recorded by consent:-
(ia) In even years (eg. 2014) – with [the Wife].
(ib) In odd years (eg. 2015) – with [the Husband].
(iia) In even years (eg. 2014) – with [the Husband].
(iib) In odd years (eg. 2015) – with [the Wife].
(iiia) In even years (eg. 2014) – with [the Wife].
(iiib) In odd years (eg. 2015) – with [the Husband].
The Wife subsequently commenced divorce proceedings on or about 26 September 2013. Interim Judgment (Divorce) (“IJ”) was granted on 5 November 2013. The Interim Judgment incorporated parties’ agreement on custody, care and control, access and maintenance of the Child reached after the Mediation in the OS proceedings as stated at [3] above, as well as parties’ agreement on division of matrimonial assets, all of which I will term collectively as “the Orders”.
On or about 21 January 2014, the Wife filed an application in Court for additional orders to supplement the Orders, to amend certain parts of the Orders relating to access, as well as an order for the child to attend kindergarten at [xxxxxxxxxxxx] (“SUM 1023/2014”). SUM 1023/2014 was heard on 29 May 2014, and dismissed with costs fixed at $1,000.00 to the Husband on 19 June 2014.
Less than a year after SUM 1023/2014 was heard and dismissed, the Husband filed his Application on 2 February 2015 for the following orders:-
“[The Wife] and [the Husband] shall have joint custody of the child with sole care and control to [the Husband] and reasonable access to [the Wife].”
“With effect from the date of this Order, [the Husband] shall cease paying [the Wife] for the maintenance for the child.”
Subsequently, the Wife filed her Application on or about 24 March 2015 for the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations